Addition of Plasmapheresis Decreases the Incidence of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Sensitized Patients with Strong Donor-Specific Antibodies |
| |
Authors: | Enver Akalin Rajani Dinavahi Rex Friedlander Scott Ames Graciela de Boccardo Vinita Sehgal Bernd Schr?ppel Madhu Bhaskaran Susan Lerner Marileno Fotino Barbara Murphy Jonathan S. Bromberg |
| |
Affiliation: | *Renal Division, †Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, ‡Immunogenetics Laboratory, Rogosin Institute, and §Renal Division and Transplant Services, North Shore University Hospital, New York, New York |
| |
Abstract: | Background and objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of desensitization protocols using intravenous Ig with or without plasmapheresis in patients with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies on prevention of antibody-mediated rejection and downregulation of donor-specific antibodies.Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Thirty-five complement-dependent cytotoxicity T cell cross-match–negative but complement-dependent cytotoxicity B cell and/or flow cytometry cross-match–positive kidney transplant recipients were treated with high-dosage intravenous Ig plus Thymoglobulin induction treatment. Donor-specific antibody strength was stratified as strong, medium, or weak by Luminex flow beads. Group 1 patients had weak/moderate and group 2 strong donor-specific antibodiesResults: Whereas no group 1 patients had acute rejection, 66% of group 2 had acute rejection (44% antibody-mediated rejection, 22% cellular rejection). The protocol was then changed to the addition of peritransplantation plasmapheresis to patients with strong donor-specific antibodies (group 3). This change resulted in a dramatic decrease in the acute rejection rate to 7%. During a median 18 mo of follow-up, patient survival was 100, 100, and 93% and graft survival was 100, 78, and 86% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. During follow-up, 17 (52%) patients lost donor-specific antibodies completely, and 10 (30%) lost some of donor-specific antibodies and/or decreased the strength of existing donor-specific antibodies.Conclusions: These results indicated that in patients with strong donor-specific antibodies, the addition of plasmapheresis to high-dosage intravenous Ig decreases the incidence of acute rejection. The majority of the patients, whether they received intravenous Ig alone or with plasmapheresis, lost their donor-specific antibodies during follow-up.Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) in patients who are sensitized through pregnancy, previous blood transfusions, or organ transplantation is an important obstacle in kidney transplantation. Sensitized patients wait longer on the deceased-donor transplantation list, may not receive a transplant, and may have greater morbidity and mortality. Some sensitized patients may have living donor candidates, but transplantation cannot be performed because of cross-match positivity. Recent desensitization protocols using the combination of plasmapheresis (PP) or immunoadsorption to remove DSA and/or intravenous Ig (IVIG) and rituximab to downregulate antibody-mediated immune responses have made kidney transplantation feasible by abrogating complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) T cell cross-match positivity. In previous studies, two protocols were examined: High-dosage IVIG (2.0 g/kg) (1–3) and PP with low-dosage IVIG (100 mg/kg after each PP session) (4–8); however, acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) continued to be an important barrier and was still observed in at least 30 to 40% of the recipients included in these desensitization protocols, even when rituximab was added to the protocol.Whereas CDC T cell cross-match positivity is an absolute contraindication to kidney transplantation, the clinical significance of CDC B cell or flow cytometry (FC) T and/or B cell cross-match positivity are less clear. Most studies have demonstrated that CDC T cell cross-match–negative but CDC B or FC T/B cell cross-match–positive patients with DSA are at higher risk for developing acute cellular, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejection and graft loss (9,10). The role of desensitization protocols for these patients has not been studied in a large cohort. We previously reported our initial experience using low-dosage IVIG (300 mg/kg) and Thymoglobulin induction treatment in 15 patients (11,12). Because of early AMR in three patients, the IVIG dosage was increased to a total of 2.0 mg/kg in subsequent patients. Now, we present our experience in CDC T cell–negative but CDC B cell or FC T and/or B cell cross-match–positive kidney transplant recipients with DSA, who were stratified according to mean fluorescence indices of Luminex flow beads. The results showed that patients with strong DSA were at much higher risk for developing acute AMR early after transplantation, and the addition of peritransplantation PP to high-dosage IVIG and Thymoglobulin treatment significantly decreased the incidence of AMR. The majority of the patients, whether they received IVIG alone or with PP, lost DSA during follow-up. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|