首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

NK细胞与K562细胞之间相互免疫编辑作用及其对NK细胞杀伤活性的影响
引用本文:郭坤元,梅家转,姜振宇,姚开泰. NK细胞与K562细胞之间相互免疫编辑作用及其对NK细胞杀伤活性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2007, 33(4): 630-633. DOI: 国家自然科学基金资助课题(30471636)
作者姓名:郭坤元  梅家转  姜振宇  姚开泰
作者单位:(1.南方医科大学珠江医院血液科,广东 广州 510282;2.南方医科大学基础医学院病理学教研室,广东 广州 510515;3.吉林大学第一医院血液肿瘤科,吉林 长春130021)
摘    要:目的:探讨NK细胞与K562细胞混合培养前、后其杀伤活性的变化及分子机制。方法:流式细胞仪检测NK细胞与K562细胞混合培养前、后细胞表面相应分子的变化,LDH释放法测定效靶比20∶1时NK细胞对K562细胞的杀伤活性。结果:相互编辑前,K562细胞表面MICA/MICB的表达率为(79.90±0.87)%,NK细胞表面NKG2D、KIR2DL1和KIR3DL1的表达率分别为(98.27±0.67)%、(45.70±1.22)%和(35.60± 1.35)%。相互编辑后,K562细胞表面MICA/MICB和NK细胞表面NKG2D的表达率分别为(35.56±1.01)和(34.67±3.88)%,均明显低于编辑前(P=0.000);NK细胞表面KIR2DL1和KIR3DL1的表达率分别为(47.20±1.08)%和(34.03±1.20)%,与编辑前比较差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。效靶比20∶1时,NK细胞对编辑后的K562细胞的杀伤活性为(24.07±0.58)%,编辑后的NK细胞对K562细胞的杀伤活性为(16.95±2.00)%,均明显低于编辑前NK细胞对K562细胞的杀伤活性[(54.03±3.46)%](P=0.000)。结论: NK细胞与K562细胞持续性接触后,双方发生了相互免疫编辑作用;NK细胞的杀伤活性下降,其分子机制是细胞表面相应的配受体发生了变化。

关 键 词:杀伤细胞  天然   NKG2D  MHC I 类链相关分子  免疫编辑   
文章编号:1671-587X(2007)04-0630-04
收稿时间:2007-01-09
修稿时间:2007-01-09

Reciprocal immunoediting between NK cells and K562 cells and its effect on NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity
GUO Kun-yuan,MEI Jia-zhuan,JIANG Zhen-yu,YAO Kai-tai. Reciprocal immunoediting between NK cells and K562 cells and its effect on NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Med Ed, 2007, 33(4): 630-633. DOI: 国家自然科学基金资助课题(30471636)
Authors:GUO Kun-yuan  MEI Jia-zhuan  JIANG Zhen-yu  YAO Kai-tai
Affiliation:1. Department of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China;2. Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences,Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;3. Department of Hematology and Oncology, First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
Abstract:Objective To analyze the changes of cytotoxicity mediated by NK cells after 24 h coculture with K562 cells and the molecular mechanism. Methods The expressions of MICA/MICB on K562 cells, KIR2DL1, KIR3DL1, NKG2D on NK cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Cytotoxicity was detected by LDH releasing assay. Results Before editing,the expression rate of MICA/MICB on K562 cells was (79.90±0.87)%, the expression rates of NKG2D,KIRZDL1, and KIR3DL1 on NK cells were (98.27±0.67)%, (45.70±1.22)% and (35.60±1.35)%,respectively.After editing,the expression rates of M1CA/M1CB on K562 cells and NKG2D on NK cells were (35.56±1.01)% and (34.67±3.88)%,respectively;compared with before editing,there was significant difference(P=0.000).The expression rates of KIR2DL1 and KIR3DL1 on NK cells were (47.20±1.08)% and (34.03±1.20)%,compared with before editing,there was no signficant difference(P>0.05).The cytotoxicities against K562 cells by edited NK cells and against the edited K562 cells by NK cells were(24.07± 0.58)% and (16.95±2.00)% at an effector-to-target (E/T) ratio of 20∶1, both were lower than the cytotoxicity against K562 cells by NK cells (54.03%±3.46%), the differences were significant (P=0.000). Conclusion Reciprocal immunoediting between NK cells and K562 cells induced by 24 h coculture leads to decreased cytotoxicity of NK cells. The potential molecular mechanism is the changes of NKG2D and MICA/MICB expressions.
Keywords:K562 cells   killer cells, natural   NKG2D, MHC class I chain related molecules   immunoediting
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《吉林大学学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《吉林大学学报(医学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号