首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

二种髌骨骨折内固定术比较
引用本文:蔡桦,詹杰辉.二种髌骨骨折内固定术比较[J].中国骨伤,1995,8(2):12-13.
作者姓名:蔡桦  詹杰辉
作者单位:广州中医学院附属骨伤科医院
摘    要:53例髌骨骨折患者分别接受粗丝环扎固定术(39例)和张力带网丝内固定术(14例)治疗。术后三个月疗效对比显示,环扎组优良率高于张力带组,张力带组因术后克氏针尾触痛,活动功能的恢复反而普通慢于环扎组,作者认为,对髌骨骨折在选择切开复位内固定时,粗丝线环扎术应为首选。

关 键 词:髌骨骨折  骨折内固定术
收稿时间:1994/3/30 0:00:00

A comparison between two kinds of internal fixation in treating fracture of patella
Cai Hua and Zhan Jie-hui.A comparison between two kinds of internal fixation in treating fracture of patella[J].China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology,1995,8(2):12-13.
Authors:Cai Hua and Zhan Jie-hui
Institution:Cai Hua; Zhan Jie-hui
Abstract:Affiliated Hospital of Orthopaedics, Guangzhou College of TCM (510240) Fifty-three cases of fracture of patella were treated with coarse silk thread cerclage internal fixation in 39 cases, and tension steel wire internal fixation in 14 cases. Three months postoperatively showed that the former was superior than the later. It is because in later group tail of the Kirschner pin brought a touching pain postoperatively, so recovery of the function was generally slower than the former group. It is suggested that in the treatment of fracture of patellar the former method was first choice.
Keywords:Fracture of patellar Internal fixation of fracture Clinical study
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国骨伤》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国骨伤》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号