Diagnostic value and safety of dynamic MRI of contralateral breast and axilla in subjects with tissue expander |
| |
Authors: | Alfonso Fausto Marco Bernini Letizia Di Giacomo Vivian Schivartche Marco Marcasciano Donato Casella Luca Volterrani Maria Antonietta Mazzei |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, University Hospital of Siena, Viale Bracci 16, 53100 Siena, Italy;2. Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Firenze, Italy;3. Department of Medical, Surgical and Neuro Sciences, Diagnostic Imaging, University of Siena, Strada delle Scotte 2, 53100 Siena, Italy;4. Department of Breast Imaging, CDB Premium, Av Brazil, 1193 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.;5. Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Azienda U.S.L. Toscana Nord-Ovest, Hospital of Livorno, Via Vittorio Alfieri 36, 57124 Livorno, Italy;6. Department of Surgery “Valdoni”, Unit of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I – “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161 Roma, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | IntroductionTo verify the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced breast and axillary MRI in patients with tissue expander labeled as “MR-unsafe” and to confirm its safety.Patients and methodsBreast MRI examinations performed in patients with tissue expander in the period from August 2010 to December 2017 were reviewed after IRB approval. In the case of breast lesion or lymph node, breast MRI exams after definitive prosthetic replacement were used for comparison. Breast MRI was performed using 1.5 T equipment with a dedicated coil. The protocol included axial STIR sequence and axial dynamic sequence with fat suppression (1 pre-contrast and 4 post-contrast phases). Two radiologists experienced in breast imaging reviewed images using six parameters for image quality evaluation. t-Test for dependent samples, Wilcoxon and Sign test were used.ResultsTwenty-three patients (49?±?9 years, range 34–68 years) with tissue expander who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI were reviewed. Thirteen breast lesions (12.92?±?4.84?mm) and eleven lymph nodes (11.00?±?4.29?mm) were found. In breast MRI examinations used for comparison no significant difference was observed in breast lesions (12.69?±?4.71?mm, P?=?0.707) or lymph node dimensions (10.58?±?3.00?mm, P?=?0.538). No significant difference was observed in lesion classification. A significantly lower visibility was observed for vascular maps (P?0.001). None of the patients reported sensations of heating or skin burns. None of the patients revealed any clinical effects or signs of pathology after MRI examination.ConclusionWhen necessary, after adequate information and preparation, contrast-enhanced breast MRI can be performed in patients with tissue expanders maintaining its diagnostic value and safety. |
| |
Keywords: | MRI Magnetic resonance imaging MRI safety Tissue expander Breast tissue expander Expander |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|