中医治疗与传统治疗小儿肺炎的临床评价

[目的]观察小儿肺炎的中医治疗与传统治疗的临床评价比较。[方法]收集小儿肺炎病例230例,分治疗组与对照组,记录两组患儿性别、年龄、发病情况,治疗组150例在传统中医红霉素与头孢菌素联合抗感染基础上,辅以中医辨证口服中药,外治疗法敷胸散敷胸,与对照组80例单纯红霉素,头孢菌素抗感染治疗比较。[结果]治疗组平均病程可缩短2～4天,肺部啰音消失明显,快于对照组。其中有效144例,3例无效,3例因患儿本人未坚持治疗而发展至迁延性肺炎,有效率达96%,而对照组总有效率仅为77.5%,且病程相对较长,治疗组的疗效优于对照组,两组疗效有显著差异(P<0.05)。[结论]中西医结合治疗确实提高了小儿肺炎的治愈率,缩短了病程,疗效确切,值得在临床推广。

Pneumonia in Children Treated with Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Clinical Evaluation

[Objective] To investigate the treatment of pediatric pneumonia and traditional Chinese medicine clinical evaluation of treatment comparison. [Methods] collected 230 cases of pediatric pneumonia cases, sub - treatment group and treatment group, recorded the second group of children with gender, age, incidence, treatment group of traditional Chinese medicine in 150 cases of erythromycin and cephalosporins based on the joint anti-infective, TCM supplemented with oral medicine, outside the therapy casual enough enough chest chest, with the control group, 80 cases of pure erythromycin, cephalosporins compared anti - infective treatment. [Results] The treatment group the average duration may be shortened by 2 to 4 days, the disappearance of the lungs sound clear La faster than the control group, of which 144 cases of valid, invalid three cases, three cases of children because I did not adhere to treatment and the development of persistent pneumonia, efficient 96%,while the control group, the total effective rate was 77.5% , and the relatively long duration, the efficacy of the treatment group than the control group, two groups were significantly different effect (P<0.05).[Conclusion] The traditional Chinese and western medicine does improve the cure rate in children with pneumonia and shortened the course, the exact effect, it is worth promoting in clinical.