首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

内镜与腹腔镜切除胃间质瘤的临床对比研究
引用本文:李伏超,史冬涛,周晓俊,李锐,毛忠琦,陈卫昌. 内镜与腹腔镜切除胃间质瘤的临床对比研究[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2014, 0(2): 69-71
作者姓名:李伏超  史冬涛  周晓俊  李锐  毛忠琦  陈卫昌
作者单位:[1]苏州大学附属第一医院消化内科,江苏省苏州市215000 [2]苏州大学附属第一医院腹腔镜科,江苏省苏州市215000
摘    要:目的通过与腹腔镜治疗有效性和安全性的对比,探讨无腹腔镜辅助下内镜切除胃间质瘤的临床应用价值。方法回顾性收集肿瘤直径〈3.0em且边界清晰的胃间质瘤患者92例,其中53例独立行内镜下切除(内镜组),39例独立行腹腔镜切除(腹腔镜组),对比分析2组手术耗时、术中出血量、术后胃管留置时间、术后通便时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症、复发率和转移率。结果内镜组与腹腔镜组比较,手术耗时短[50(48~58)min比70(50~95)rain,U=1575.00,P〈0.01],术中出血量少[10(5—15)ml比20(20—30)ml,U=1794.00,P〈0.01],术后通便早[18(8~36)h比24(20—40)h,U=1666.00,P〈0.01],而在术后胃管留置时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症等方面差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。内镜组术后随访(27±15)个月,腹腔镜组术后随访(24±11)个月,2组随访时间差异无统计学意义(t=0.3084,P〉0.05),随访期间均未见胃间质瘤复发和转移,亦无因胃间质瘤而死亡的病例。结论对于直径〈3.0em且边界清晰的胃间质瘤行内镜下独立切除是安全可行的,与腹腔镜手术疗效相近,且创伤更小、恢复更快。

关 键 词:胃间质瘤  内窥镜  腹腔镜

Comparison between endoscopy and laparoscopy in resection of gastric stromai tumor
Li Fuchao Shi Dongtao,Zhou Xiaojun,Li Rui,Mao Zhongqi,Chen Weichang. Comparison between endoscopy and laparoscopy in resection of gastric stromai tumor[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy, 2014, 0(2): 69-71
Authors:Li Fuchao Shi Dongtao  Zhou Xiaojun  Li Rui  Mao Zhongqi  Chen Weichang
Affiliation:. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sooehow University, Suzhou 215000, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the feasibility and safety of endoscopy with laparoscopy and without for gastric stromal tumor. Methods A retrospective and comprehensive analysis was made based on the clinical data of endoscopic (53 cases ) and laparoscopic (39 cases ) resection for gastric stromal tumor (diameter 〈 3 cm with clear boundary), by comparing the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, indwell- ing time of postoperative gastric tube, recovery time of bowel functions, postoperative complications, hospi- talization time, metastasis, recurrence rate. Results Compared with the laparoscopic group, the endoscopic group required shorter operation time [ 50 (48-58) min VS 70 ( 50-95 ) min, U = 1575.00, P 〈 0. 01 ], less intraoperative blood loss [ 10 ( 5-15 ) ml VS 20 (20-30) ml, U = 1794.00, P 〈 0. 01 ], earlier recovery of bowel functions [ 18 (8-36) h VS 24 (20-40) h, U = 1666.00, P 〈 0. 01 ], hospitalization time, indwelling time of the postoperative gastric tube and postoperative complications showed no statistical difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The postoperative follow-up time were (27 ±15 ) and (24 ± 11 ) months in the endoscopic and lapa- roscopic group, respectively (t = 0. 3084, P 〉 0. 05). During the follow-up, no tumor recurrence or distant metastasis was discovered, nor was death of gastric stromal tumor. Conclusion Endoscopy without the as- sist of laparoscopy for the gastric stromal tumor, whose diameter is less than 3 cm with clear boundary, is safe and less invasive, and leads to quick recovery.
Keywords:Gastric stromal tumor  Endoscopes  Laparoscopes
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号