Unknown Uterine Sears, Unknown Risks |
| |
Authors: | T. K. Lau MRCOG F. Chan MBChB |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong |
| |
Abstract: | EDITORIAL COMMENT: We accepted these case reports for publication not only to remind readers that a classical Caesarean scar is more likely than a lower uterine segment scar to rupture or dehisce, but also to stress that women should be counselled appropriately when classical Caesarean section has been performed. Our Australian population is also mobile and women may not return to the same institution or obstetrician for their next confinement. Tracing the details of a previous delivery from another hospital or practitioner even in the same community should be a routine enquiry when a patient has had a Caesarean section in a previous pregnancy but the required information is often difficult to obtain. The woman herse(fis the essential repository for this information. It should also be noted that the recent increase in the number of Caesarean sections performed for fetal indications before 30 weeks' gestation has resulted in more vertical incisions because of a poorly formed lower uterine segment. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|