首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Stridor is not a scientifically valid outcome measure for assessing airway injury
Authors:JOSEF HOLZKI MD,MICHAEL LASCHAT MD,&dagger   AND CHRISTIAN PUDER MD,&Dagger  
Affiliation:Emeritus, Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia. Children's Hospital Cologne, Germany;, Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Children's Hospital Cologne, Germany;and Department of Paediatric ENT-surgery, Children's Hospital Cologne, Germany
Abstract:
Since about a decade cuffed intubation is becoming more popular in pediatric anesthesia. Studies supporting cuffed intubation compared cuffed and uncuffed intubation by using stridor as main outcome measure after extubation. No differentiations were made between benign (oedema) and severe (ulceration of mucosa) lesions. Stridor was considered to represent all relevant injuries. Far reaching conclusions for daily practice were drawn from these studies. Pediatric endoscopists and – ENT-surgeons with extensive experience in this field have warned against this opinion because significant injury of the airway is not always accompanied by stridor! The symptom of stridor might develop weeks and months after injury when silent ulcerations of the mucosa retract to significant stenosis. Only endoscopy can evidently detect all airway injuries. Studies describing airway injury by endoscopic control are urgently needed to find the best way of preventing airway injury by intubation.
Keywords:stridor    cuffed intubation    outcome measure    damage    pediatric airway
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号