首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

DTI对鉴别脑低级别胶质瘤、脑梗死和病毒性脑炎的价值
引用本文:陈晓兵,罗天友,彭娟,.DTI对鉴别脑低级别胶质瘤、脑梗死和病毒性脑炎的价值[J].放射学实践,2012,27(7):730-734.
作者姓名:陈晓兵  罗天友  彭娟  
作者单位:陈晓兵 (湘乡市人民医院放射科, 湖南,411400) ; 罗天友 (重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科,重庆,400016) ; 彭娟 (重庆医科大学附属第一医院放射科,重庆,400016) ;
基金项目:重庆市科技攻关计划项目
摘    要:目的:探讨磁共振扩散张量成像在鉴别低级别脑胶质瘤、脑梗死和病毒性脑炎中的应用价值。方法:22例低级别脑胶质瘤、26例急性或亚急性期脑梗死和18例病毒性脑炎患者在治疗或手术前行常规MRI和DTI检查。脑低级别胶质瘤患者均经手术病理证实,病毒性脑炎和脑梗死患者均经临床治疗及随访证实。测量并计算3组病灶的表观扩散系数(ADC)值和相对表观扩散系数(rADC)值、各向异性分数(FA)值和相对各向异性分数(rFA)值,并进行统计学分析。结果:脑低级别胶质瘤组平均ADC、rADC、FA和rFA值分别为(1.55±0.08)×10-3 mm2/s、1.68±0.25、0.17±0.03和0.42±0.08,脑梗死组分别为(0.54±0.12)×10-3 mm2/s、0.64±0.12、0.14±0.03和0.30±0.05,病毒性脑炎组分别为(0.84±0.07)×10-3 mm2/s、1.07±0.05、0.17±0.02和0.43±0.09。三组病例的平均ADC值及rADC值间的差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.01),脑低级别胶质瘤与脑梗死的FA值和rFA值之间、病毒性脑炎与脑梗死的FA值和rFA值之间差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.01),脑低级别胶质瘤与病毒性脑炎的FA值和rFA值之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:综合利用DTI的ADC值、rADC值、FA值及rFA值,对鉴别脑低级别胶质瘤、脑梗死和病毒性脑炎具有较高的指导价值。

关 键 词:脑疾病  胶质瘤  脑梗死  病毒性脑炎  磁共振成像  扩散张量成像

Diffusion tensor imaging in the differential diagnosis of low-grade cerebral glioma, cerebral infarction and viral encephalitis
CHEN Xiao-bing,LUO Tian-you,PENG Juan.Diffusion tensor imaging in the differential diagnosis of low-grade cerebral glioma, cerebral infarction and viral encephalitis[J].Radiologic Practice,2012,27(7):730-734.
Authors:CHEN Xiao-bing  LUO Tian-you  PENG Juan
Institution:. Department of Radiology, People's Hospital of Xiangxiang City, Hunan 411400,P. R. China
Abstract:Objective:To study the value of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the differential diagnosis of low-grade cerebral glioma, cerebral infarction and viral encephalitis. Methods: Conventional MR imaging and DTI were performed in 22 cases with low-grade cerebral glioma,26 cases with acute or subacute cerebral infarction and 18 cases with acute or subacute viral encephalitis before treatment or surgery. The diagnoses of cerebral low-grade glioma was confirmed by surgery and pa thology,and the diagnoses of cerebral infarction/viral encephalitis were made by clinically follow-up. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value,relative ADC value (rADC),fractional anisotrophy (FA) value and relative FA values (rFA) of the three groups were measured and calculated respectively. Results: The mean ADC values, rADC values, FA values and rFA values of the patients with low grade cerebral glioma was (1. 55±0.08)×10^3mm^2 /s,1. 68±0.25,0. 17±0.03, 0.42±0.08 respectively;of cerebral infarction was (0.54±0.12)×10^3mm^2/s,0. 64±0.12,0.14±0. 03,0. 30±0. 05 re spectively;of viral encephalitis was (0.84±0.07)×10^3mm^2/s,1. 07±0. 05,0.17±0. 02,0. 43±0. 09 respectively. There were significant differences in the mean ADC values and rADC values (P〈0.01) among the three groups,as well as significant differences in the mean FA values and rFA values (P〈0.01) between low grade cerebral glioma and cerebral infarc tion, so was between viral encephalitis and cerebral infarction (P〈0.01). Yet there wasn't significant difference in the mean FA values and rFA values (P〉0.05) between low grade cerebral glioma and viral encephalitis. Conclusion: The combination of ADC value, rADC value,FA value and rFA value in DTI play an important role in the differential diagnosis of low grade cerebral glioma,cerebral infarction and viral encephalitis.
Keywords:Brain diseases  Gliomas  Cerebral infarction  Viral encephalitis  Magnetic resonance imaging  Diffusion weighted imaging
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《放射学实践》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《放射学实践》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号