首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

3种新型冠状病毒核酸检测试剂对120份样本检测结果的比较与分析
引用本文:曾林子,田自城,黄玉兰,韩声付,肯布,张光慧,贾春燕,杨小蓉. 3种新型冠状病毒核酸检测试剂对120份样本检测结果的比较与分析[J]. 中国人兽共患病杂志, 2020, 36(10): 791-796. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2020.00.136
作者姓名:曾林子  田自城  黄玉兰  韩声付  肯布  张光慧  贾春燕  杨小蓉
作者单位:1.四川省疾病预防控制中心,成都 610041;2.甘孜州疾病预防控制中心,康定 626000;3.炉霍县疾病预防控制中心,炉霍 626500
基金项目:新型冠状病毒科技攻关应急项目(No.2020YFS0015); 曾林子与田自城并列第一作者
摘    要:
目的对市售的3种国产新型冠状病毒核酸检测试剂(实时荧光RT-PCR法)的检测结果进行比较和分析,以供检测机构参考。方法采用3种核酸检测试剂(实时荧光RT-PCR法)对120份新冠肺炎病人和密切接触者的咽拭子、尿液、唾液和粪便样本进行平行检测,运用SPSS20软件采用卡方检验对检测结果进行分析。结果 120份样本中,3种试剂阳性率分别为42.50%(51/120)、39.17%(47/120)和41.67%(50/120),阳性检出率无统计学差异(χ2=0.298,P>0.05),对4种样本检测阳性检出率,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3种试剂检测结果一致的有89份。检测结果一致性从高到低为:A试剂和C试剂>B试剂和C试剂>A试剂和B试剂。结论由于不同厂家试剂灵敏度和准确性不同导致检测结果和检测一致性存在差异,提示试剂厂家需进一步优化性能,提高检测灵敏度和准确性,同时各检测机构应采取多种质控方法以确保新冠病毒核酸检测准确性,以便更好地为疫情防控、病人救治提供科学依据。

关 键 词:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)  核酸检测试剂  检测
收稿时间:2020-04-20

Comparison and analysis of results of 120 specimens with three SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection reagents
ZENG Lin-zi,TIAN Zi-cheng,HUANG Yu-lan,HAN Sheng-fu,KENG Bu,ZHANG Guang-hui,JIA Chun-yan,YANG Xiao-rong. Comparison and analysis of results of 120 specimens with three SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection reagents[J]. Chinese Journal of Zoonoses, 2020, 36(10): 791-796. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2020.00.136
Authors:ZENG Lin-zi  TIAN Zi-cheng  HUANG Yu-lan  HAN Sheng-fu  KENG Bu  ZHANG Guang-hui  JIA Chun-yan  YANG Xiao-rong
Affiliation:1.SiChuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, ChengDu 610041,China;2.Ganzi Tibeian Autonomous Preferture Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Kangding 626000,China;3.LuHuo Center for Disease Control and Prevention,LuHuo 626500,China
Abstract:
To provide reference for laboratory by comparing and analyzing the test result of three SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection reagents (real-time RT-PCR).Three kinds of nucleic acid detection reagents (real-time RT-PCR) were used to parallel detect 120 Corona Virus Disease 2019(COVID-19) specimens, including swabs, urine, saliva and feces,and the results were analyzed with SPSS20. As results the positive rates for the A,B,C reagents were 42.50%(51/120), 39.17%(47/120), and 41.67%(50/120), respectively, 89 cases were shown in the same results and there was no significant difference among three reagents(χ2=0.298,P>0.05), there was no significant difference in the positive detection rate of the four types samples, also(P>0.05). The consistency of test results from high to low is: A reagent and C reagent> B reagent and C reagent> A reagent and B reagent. There are differences in the test results and test consistency between different manufacturers due to different sensitivity and accuracy. The reagent performance should be further optimized to improve detection sensitivity and accuracy should be improved. At the same time, laboratory should take various quality control methods to ensure the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection,in order to provide better scientific basis for disease prevention and control.
Keywords:SARS-CoV-2  nucleic acid test reagent  detection  
点击此处可从《中国人兽共患病杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国人兽共患病杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号