|
|||||
|
|
| 不同脱敏方法治疗牙本质过敏症的比较研究 | |
| 引用本文： | 陈南燕. 不同脱敏方法治疗牙本质过敏症的比较研究[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2005, 3(2): 68-70 |
| 作者姓名： | 陈南燕 |
| 作者单位： | 陕西省安康市中心医院中腔科 |
| 摘 要： | 目的:比较激光、格鲁玛脱敏剂、氟化钠甘油治疗牙本质过敏症的疗效.方法:将195例患者302颗患牙随机分为3组,分别采用激光、格鲁玛脱敏剂、氟化钠甘油进行脱敏治疗并将各组疗效对比分析.结果:激光和格鲁玛脱敏剂即刻疗效明显优于氟化钠甘油,1年后激光疗效明显优于格鲁玛脱敏剂和氟化钠甘油.结论:激光和格鲁玛脱敏剂治疗牙本质过敏症均是目前较有效的方法,疗效明显优于氟化钠甘油,远期疗效以激光最佳. |
| 关 键 词： | 牙本质过敏 脱敏疗法 Nd:YAG激光 脱敏剂 氟化钠甘油 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-2973(2005)02-0068-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-01-07 |
Study on different methods in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity |
|
| CHEN Nan-yan. Study on different methods in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity[J]. Chinese JOurnal of Geriatric Dentistry, 2005, 3(2): 68-70 | |
| Authors: | CHEN Nan-yan |
| Abstract: | Objective: To compare the effects of Nd:YAG laser, Gluma desensitizer and the sodium fluoride on the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Methods: 195 patients with 302 dentin hypersensitive teeth were divided into three groups randomlly. Group A were treated with Nd: YAG laser, group B with Gluma desensitizer and group C with sodium fluoride. The desensitizing effects of the three methods were compared. Results: The instant effects of Nd:YAG desensitizing laser and Gluma desensitizer were better than that of the sodium fluoride. One year later, the effect of Nd:YAG laser was better than those of the Gluma desensitizer and the sodium fluoride. Conclusion: Nd:YAG laser and Gluma desensitizer were moreveffective in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity than the sodium fluoride. The long-term effect of Nd:YAG laser is the best in the three methods. |
| Keywords: | dentin sensitivity hyposensitization therapy Nd:YAG laser desensitizer sodium fluoride |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |