Efficacy of Dronedarone Versus Propafenone in the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Electrical Cardioversion

Purpose

Our objective was to compare the efficacy of dronedarone and propafenone in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after electrical cardioversion.

Methods

In this single-center, open-label, randomized trial, we randomly assigned patients with AF after electrical cardioversion to receive dronedarone 400 mg BID or propafenone 150 mg TID.Follow-up clinical evaluations were conducted at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months of treatment. The primary end point was the time to the first recurrence of AF.

Findings

A total of 98 patients were enrolled (79 men; mean age, 59.2 years; n = 49 per group). The median times to first recurrence of AF were 31 days in the dronedarone group and 32 days in the propafenone group (P = 0.715). The median (interquartile range) ventricular rates at first recurrence of AF were 76.5 (67.3–86.5) beats/min in the dronedarone group and 83.0 (71.0–96.0) beats/min in the propafenone group (P = 0.059).

Implications

Dronedarone and propafenone had similar efficacies in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF after electrical cardioversion. The ventricular rate at the first recurrence of AF was numerically but not statistically significantly lower in the dronedarone group than in the propafenone group. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01991119.