首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

腰大池-腹腔分流术与脑室-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积水疗效的系统评价
引用本文:解虎涛,程宏伟,李长元,洪文明,单明,包明月,吴炳山.腰大池-腹腔分流术与脑室-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积水疗效的系统评价[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2016,43(5):385-390.
作者姓名:解虎涛  程宏伟  李长元  洪文明  单明  包明月  吴炳山
作者单位:安徽医科大学第一附属医院神经外科,安徽合肥,230022
摘    要:目的系统评价腰大池-腹腔分流术与脑室-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积水的疗效和安全性。方法计算机检索Pub Med、Cochrane图书馆、EMbase、CNKI、Wan Fang Data、CBM及VIP数据库,检索时限自1990年5月至2016年5月,收集关于LPS与VPS比较治疗交通性脑积水的随机对照试验或队列研究,利用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入13篇文献,共计1321例患者。Meta分析结果显示,在手术疗效方面,LPS组与VPS组治疗交通性脑积水的手术有效率之间无明显的统计学差异,但LPS手术一次成功率高于VPS;在并发症方面,LPS的术后出血并发症、感染性并发症、分流管相关并发症及术后癫痫的发生率更低,两种术式术后出现分流异常的发生率无明显统计学差异。结论 LPS与VPS治疗交通性脑积水的疗效相当,但LPS一次手术成功率更高,术后并发症的发生率更低,整体而言,LPS优于VPS。

关 键 词:腰大池-腹腔分流术  脑室-腹腔分流术  交通性脑积水  系统评价  Meta分析
收稿时间:2016/6/15 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/9/28 0:00:00

Efficacy of lumbo-peritoneal shunt versus ventriculo-peritoneal shunt for treatment of communicating hydrocephalus: a systematic review
XIE Hu-Tao,CHENG Hong-Wei,LI Chang-Yuan,HONG Wen-Ming,SHAN Ming,BAO Ming-Yue,WU Bing-Shan.Efficacy of lumbo-peritoneal shunt versus ventriculo-peritoneal shunt for treatment of communicating hydrocephalus: a systematic review[J].Journal of International Neurology and Neurosurgery,2016,43(5):385-390.
Authors:XIE Hu-Tao  CHENG Hong-Wei  LI Chang-Yuan  HONG Wen-Ming  SHAN Ming  BAO Ming-Yue  WU Bing-Shan
Institution:Department of Neurosurgery, The First affiliated Hospital of Anhui medical University, Hefei, 230022, China
Abstract:

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of lumbo-peritoneal shunt (LPS) and ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VPS) for the treatment of communicating hydrocephalus.Methods Databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and VIP were searched to collect randomized controlled trials or cohort studies on LPS versus VPS for the treatment of communicating hydrocephalus that were published from May 1990 to May 2016. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.Results Thirteen articles were included in the study, with a total of 1321 patients. The meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the LPS group and the VPS group in the effectiveness of the surgical treatment of communicating hydrocephalusRR=1.13, 95%CI (1.00, 1.28), P=0.06]. However, the success rate of LPS was significantly higher than that of VPSRR=1.14, 95%CI (1.05, 1.23), P=0.0010]. Compared with those treated with VPS, the patients treated with LPS had significantly lower incidence rates of postoperative bleeding complicationsRR=0.35, 95%CI (0.15, 0.81), P=0.01], infectious complicationsRR=0.29, 95% CI (0.16, 0.51), P<0.0001], and shunt tube-related complicationsRR=0.38, 95%CI (0.27, 0.52), P<0.00001]. The incidence of postoperative shunt abnormalities showed no significant difference between the two operationsRR=0.79, 95%CI(0.41, 1.53), P=0.49].Conclusions The results of this study suggest that LPS and VPS are equivalent in the treatment of communicating hydrocephalus. However, the success rate of LPS is higher, and the incidence of postoperative complications is lower after LPS. Overall, LPS is superior to VPS.

Keywords:Lumbo-peritoneal shunt  Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt  Communicating hydrocephalus  Systematic review  Meta-analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《国际神经病学神经外科学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际神经病学神经外科学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号