| Abstract: | ![]()
Because of its widespread availability and the generally increasing economic pressure, endoscopy needs critical scrutiny to establish appropriate clinical guidelines. We carried out a prospective evaluation of 200 consecutive upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopies to ascertain the frequency of abnormal findings when specific indications were the impetus to endoscopy. Those indications were esophageal complaints, upper GI bleeding, abdominal discomfort, known premalignant disorders and abnormal findings on barium meal. The overall frequency of abnormal findings for all indications was 66%. Abnormal endoscopic findings were most often present when upper GI bleeding or premalignant conditions (88 and 87%, respectively) were reasons for endoscopy. Endoscopic confirmation of lesions seen on barium meal was 64%. Only 37% of patients endoscoped for abdominal discomfort had abnormal findings. Moreover, as symptoms resolved in 70% of such patients within 1 to 9 weeks, the low yield of endoscopy suggests that our current threshold for endoscopy in this setting may be too low. Refinement of the indications for and reassessment of the timing of endoscopy are needed. |
