Exploring the half-life of glyphosate in human urine samples |
| |
Authors: | Alison Connolly Kate Jones Ioannis Basinas Karen S. Galea Laura Kenny Padraic McGowan Marie A. Coggins |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Centre for Climate and Air Pollution Studies, School of Physics and The Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway, H91 CF50, Ireland;2. Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Harpur Hill, Buxton, SK17 9JN, UK;3. Centre for Human Exposure Science (CHES), Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), Edinburgh, EH14 4AP, UK;4. Irish Commissioners for Public Works, Jonathon Swift Street, Trim, Co Meath, C15 NX36, Ireland |
| |
Abstract: |
BackgroundThe International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has recently classified glyphosate as a Group 2A ‘probably carcinogenic to humans’. Due to this carcinogenic classification and resulting international debate, there is an increased demand for studies evaluating human health effects from glyphosate exposures. There is currently limited information on human exposures to glyphosate and a paucity of data regarding glyphosate's biological half-life in humans.ObjectiveThis study aims to estimate the human half-life of glyphosate from human urine samples collected from amenity horticulture workers using glyphosate based pesticide products.MethodsFull void urine spot samples were collected over a period of approximately 24?h for eight work tasks involving seven workers. The elimination time and estimation of the half-life of glyphosate using three different measurement metrics: the unadjusted glyphosate concentrations, creatinine corrected concentrations and by using Urinary Excretion Rates (UER) (μg L?1, μmol/mol creatinine and UER μg L?1) was calculated by summary and linear interpolation using regression analysis.ResultsThis study estimates the human biological half-life of glyphosate as approximately 5 ½, 10 and 7 ¼ hours for unadjusted samples, creatinine corrected concentrations and by using UER (μg L?1, μmol/mol creatinine, UER μg L?1), respectively. The approximated glyphosate half-life calculations seem to have less variability when using the UER compared to the other measuring metrics.ConclusionThis study provides new information on the elimination rate of glyphosate and an approximate biological half-life range for humans. This information can help optimise the design of sampling strategies, as well as assisting in the interpretation of results for human biomonitoring studies involving this active ingredient. The data could also contribute to the development or refinement of Physiologically Based PharmacoKinetic (PBPK) models for glyphosate. |
| |
Keywords: | Half-life Biomonitoring Pesticides Glyphosate Elimination rate Urine Toxicokinetics Glyphosate (Pubmed CID: 3496) |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|