Fixation of subcondylar fractures of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial comparing one trapezoidal plate with two miniplates

Subcondylar fracture of the mandible accounts for 25–35% of all mandibular fractures. In the past, most subcondylar fractures were managed non-surgically. The traditional method of fixation for subcondylar fractures uses two miniplates; however some bench studies have reported that trapezoidal plates are superior. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of subcondylar fractures fixed either with two non-parallel straight miniplates or with one trapezoidal plate. A randomized clinical trial was designed and implemented. Fifty-two consecutive patients with subcondylar fractures were recruited. All patients underwent surgery via a retromandibular approach. The time taken for fixation of the plate after fracture reduction and postoperative outcomes and complications were compared between the groups. The trapezoidal plates were superior in terms of ease of adaptation and time taken for fixation (P =  0.0001). Plate fracture was observed only in the two miniplates group, in four (16%) patients. Outcomes were similar in the two groups in terms of occlusion, mouth opening, protrusion, and lateral excursion. In conclusion, both systems – two miniplates and the trapezoidal plate – provide functionally stable fixation. The outcome was significantly better for the trapezoidal plate than for two miniplates regarding the time taken for insertion and ease of adaptation, but not for other parameters.