Controversies concerning calcium antagonists |
| |
Authors: | Paul R. Lichtlen |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;(2) Department of Cardiology, Hannover Medical School, P.O. Box 61 01 80, D-30625 Hannover, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Summary The paper discusses the controversial attitude regarding the safety of calcium channel blockers (CCBs), especially of the dihydropyridine nifedipine, induced through several meta-analyses of studies with CCBs by Dr. Furberg et al.; as a result, a detrimental effect of CCBs, especially during acute myocardial infarction, has been claimed. Several independent re-analyses of the 16 studies, all performed in the 1980s and mainly using the short-acting nifedipine capsule, did not confirm Furberg's results and showed an insignificant mortality difference between patients on CCBs versus those on control. Nevertheless, new safety studies applying long-acting CCBs (half-lives of 1 or more days) combined with efficacy assessments are necessary, both in hypertension as well as coronary artery disease, to finally clear up this important question. |
| |
Keywords: | calcium channel blockers hypertension coronary disease acute myocardial infarction nifedipine |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|