首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

国际临床指南评价工具的发展与启示
引用本文:张悦,张士靖,周志超,吴梦佳. 国际临床指南评价工具的发展与启示[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2015, 24(1): 11-16
作者姓名:张悦  张士靖  周志超  吴梦佳
作者单位:1. 华中科技大学医药卫生管理学院,湖北 武汉,430030
2. 北京大学医学院,北京,100083
摘    要:
以22个指南评价工具为研究对象,分析了国际临床指南评价工具的出台背景和特点、维度和条目内容,介绍了国外临床指南评价工具的发展历程,演变过程、发展规律和存在的问题,为开发本土化的临床指南评价工具提供依据。研究发现指南评价工具出现明显分类;指南评价工具正力求在全面性和实用性之间达到平衡;现有评价工具对指南的临床内容评价不足,评分系统有待改进;指南评价应越来越多地考虑价值取向与利益冲突,考虑病人的意向与参与。

关 键 词:循证医学信息  临床指南  评价工具  质量评价  内容分析  综述
收稿时间:2014-12-01

Development of international appraisal tools for clinical guidelines
ZHANG Yue,ZHANG Shi-jing,ZHOU Zhi-chao and WU Meng-jia. Development of international appraisal tools for clinical guidelines[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science, 2015, 24(1): 11-16
Authors:ZHANG Yue  ZHANG Shi-jing  ZHOU Zhi-chao  WU Meng-jia
Affiliation:Medical and Health Management School, Central South University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China;Medical and Health Management School, Central South University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China;Medical College of Peking University, Beijing 100083, China;Medical and Health Management School, Central South University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
Abstract:
The background,features,dimension and contents of 22 international appraisal tools for clinical guidelines were analyzed,and their history,evolution,rules and problems were described,in order to provide the evidence for developing appraisal tools for domestic clinical guidelines.In the study,it was found that the guideline evaluation tools have been classified and there is a constant strive to achieve the balance between comprehensiveness and practicability.But the existing evaluation tools are insufficient for clinical practical contents of guidelines.The scoring system should be improved.In addition,conflicts of interest,value choice and patients' involvement should be considered increasingly, and should become an important part of the guideline evaluation tools.
Keywords:Medical information   Evidence-based clinical guidelines   Appraisal tools   Quality assessment   Content analysis   Review
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华医学图书情报杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华医学图书情报杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号