首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

“中西医并重”视角下中医“治未病”与健康管理的对比及融合研究
引用本文:方锐,杨勇,任建萍,杨磊,许虹.“中西医并重”视角下中医“治未病”与健康管理的对比及融合研究[J].世界科学技术-中医药现代化,2018,20(11):1929-1935.
作者姓名:方锐  杨勇  任建萍  杨磊  许虹
作者单位:杭州师范大学医学院 杭州 310018,杭州师范大学医学院 杭州 310018;浙江中医药大学附属广兴医院 杭州 310007,杭州师范大学医学院 杭州 310018,杭州师范大学医学院 杭州 310018,杭州师范大学医学院 杭州 310018;杭州师范大学健康与护理研究院 杭州 310018
基金项目:国家教育部“治未病与健康管理”服务国家特殊需求博士人才培养项目(学位〔2013〕46号),负责人:杨磊;浙江省中医药管理局科技计划项目(2018ZB100):中医“治未病”与现代健康管理的比较研究,负责人:任建萍;杭州师范大学研究生课程建设项目(YS04001003034):《治未病概论》,负责人:许虹。
摘    要:自2007年,国家中医药管理局实施中医治未病健康工程以来,相继推行“治未病”科建设,印发了中医药健康管理服务规范,大力构建中医预防保健服务体系。中医“治未病”的未病先防、既病防变与瘥后防复等思想内涵充分体现了中医预防保健的思维模式,而健康管理是对健康危险因素的监测、评估、干预与随访跟踪的全过程。本文通过比较研究法,从历史源流、思想内涵、指导思想及关键策略与技术等方面对中医“治未病”与健康管理进行了深入对比剖析,发掘了中医“治未病”在理论层面和综合调理手段上优势更为明显,而现代健康管理在应用流程与技术方法更为先进;二者的相同点在于对健康促进与疾病预防的追求,强调整体医学观念及对影响健康之“因”的关注,且在理论与实践、核心理念及技术方法上存在可能融合点。中医“治未病”思想指导下的“未病-未传-未复”阶段性监测-评估-干预应为中医健康管理的主导思路,当前基于中医“治未病”思想指导下的亚健康、体质偏颇、慢性病等人群的健康管理(预防、治疗及康复干预)研究取得一定成效,但不同生命周期的中医健康或疾病风险监测与评估有待加强。

关 键 词:治未病  健康管理  对比  理论研究

Discussion on Comparison and Fusion of Preventive Treatment of Chinese Medicine and Health Management in the Perspective of "Equal Importance on Chinese Medicine andWestern Medicine"
Fang Rui,Yang Yong,Ren Jianping,Yang Lei and Xu Hong.Discussion on Comparison and Fusion of Preventive Treatment of Chinese Medicine and Health Management in the Perspective of "Equal Importance on Chinese Medicine andWestern Medicine"[J].World Science and Technology-Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2018,20(11):1929-1935.
Authors:Fang Rui  Yang Yong  Ren Jianping  Yang Lei and Xu Hong
Abstract:Since 2007, the State Administration of TCM has implemented the preventive treatment of TCM health project, support the development of the Preventive treatment Section, issued the TCM health management service standards for special groups, and vigorously established the TCM preventive health service system. The thought of preventive treatment in TCM fully embodies the thinking mode of preventive and health care for TCM, but health management is a specific process of monitoring, evaluation, intervention and follow-up of health risk factors. In this paper, through comparative research methods, we analyzed the similarities and differences between preventive treatment of TCM and health management from historical origins, ideological content, guiding ideology, and key strategies and techniques, and we have discovered preventive treatment of TCM has more obvious advantages in theoretical height and comprehensive conditioning, and modern health management is more advanced in the application process and technical means. Their common points in the pursuit of health promotion and disease prevention, the emphasis on holistic medical concepts, and the focus on health risk factors, and the possible fusion of preventive treatment of TCM and health management in core ideas, theory and practice and technical methods, especially for prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of sub-health, constitution bias, chronic diseases and other groups. The phased monitoring-assessment-intervention approach under the guidance of the idea of preventive treatment can provide suggestions for the development ideas of TCM health management. Research on TCM health risks monitoring and assessment in different life cycles needs to be strengthened.
Keywords:preventive treatment  health management  comparison  theoretical research
点击此处可从《世界科学技术-中医药现代化》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《世界科学技术-中医药现代化》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号