首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

222Rn-220Rn分辨探测器参加国际比对结果分析
引用本文:宋延超,崔宏星,张庆召,练德幸,侯长松,武云云.222Rn-220Rn分辨探测器参加国际比对结果分析[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2018,38(12):938-941.
作者姓名:宋延超  崔宏星  张庆召  练德幸  侯长松  武云云
作者单位:100088 北京, 中国疾病预防控制中心辐射防护与核安全医学所 辐射防护与核应急中国疾病预防控制中心重点实验室,100088 北京, 中国疾病预防控制中心辐射防护与核安全医学所 辐射防护与核应急中国疾病预防控制中心重点实验室,100088 北京, 中国疾病预防控制中心辐射防护与核安全医学所 辐射防护与核应急中国疾病预防控制中心重点实验室,100088 北京, 中国疾病预防控制中心辐射防护与核安全医学所 辐射防护与核应急中国疾病预防控制中心重点实验室,100088 北京, 中国疾病预防控制中心辐射防护与核安全医学所 辐射防护与核应急中国疾病预防控制中心重点实验室,100088 北京, 中国疾病预防控制中心辐射防护与核安全医学所 辐射防护与核应急中国疾病预防控制中心重点实验室
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(11375164)
摘    要:目的 提高222Rn与220Rn的累积测量水平,保证测量结果的准确性与可靠性。方法 采用中国疾病预防控制中心辐射防护与核安全医学所的氡课题组(以下简称本实验室)改进的LD-P型222Rn-220Rn分辨探测器参加日本放射线医学综合研究所(NIRS)组织的222Rn-220Rn累积探测器国际比对。将222Rn-220Rn分辨探测器寄往日本,在NIRS的222Rn室和220Rn室进行不同条件下的比对,暴露结束后再寄回本实验室进行蚀刻与分析,测量结果告知NIRS。最后NIRS将222Rn与220Rn暴露参考值回馈本实验室。结果 在高222Rn和低222Rn条件下,测量值与NIRS提供的参考值的相对百分偏差(RPD)分别为-12.0%、-11.8%;变异系数(COV)分别为3.0%、6.2%。在高220Rn和低220Rn条件下,测量值与NIRS提供的参考值的相对百分偏差(RPD)分别为-0.8%、-8.0%;变异系数(COV)分别为6.7%、4.5%。结论 本次比对LD-P型探测器222Rn与220Rn的测量结果均为NIRS规定的Ι级结果(PRD<10%),比对结果较好。

关 键 词:222Rn  220Rn  分辨探测器  国际比对
收稿时间:2018/5/18 0:00:00

Analysis of intercomparison results for radon-thoron discriminative detector
Song Yanchao,Cui Hongxing,Zhang Qingzhao,Lian Dexing,Hou Changsong and Wu Yunyun.Analysis of intercomparison results for radon-thoron discriminative detector[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2018,38(12):938-941.
Authors:Song Yanchao  Cui Hongxing  Zhang Qingzhao  Lian Dexing  Hou Changsong and Wu Yunyun
Institution:Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China,Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China,Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China,Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China,Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China and Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China
Abstract:Objective To increase the cumulative measurement level of 222Rn and 220Rn and ensure the accuracy and reliability of the measurement result.Methods By using improved 222Rn-220Rn discriminative detectors (LD-P detectors), the radon research group of National Institute for Radiological Protection Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention participated with the intercomparison organized by National Institute of Radiological Science (NIRS), Japan. Specifically, with the 222Rn-220Rn discriminative detectors being sent to Japan, the comparison was completed under different conditions in the 222Rn chamber and 220Rn chamber in NIRS. After exposure, the detectors were sent back to our laboratory for etching and analysis, and then measurement result were informed to NIRS. Finally, NIRS returned the exposure reference values of 222Rn and 220Rn to our laboratory.Results Under the conditions of high and low levels of 222Rn, the relative percentage differences (RPD) between the measured values and the reference value provided by the NIRS were -12.0% and -11.8%, respectively, while coefficients of variation (COV) were 3.0% and 6.2%, respectively. Under the conditions of high level and low levels of 220Rn, the relative percentage differences (RPD) between the measured value and the reference value provided by the NIRS were -0.8% and -8.0%, respectively; coefficients of variation (COV) were 6.7% and 4.5%, respectively.Conclusions This intercomparison result were categorized by NIRS (PRD<10%), with the satisfactory result of LD-P detectors available.
Keywords:222Rn  220Rn  Discriminative detector  Intercomparison
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号