Use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery despite improved medical therapy for unstable angina pectoris |
| |
Authors: | D E Leeman C H McCabe D P Faxon B H Lorell M A Kellett R G McKay T Varricchione D S Baim |
| |
Affiliation: | Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. |
| |
Abstract: | To evaluate current strategies for the management of unstable angina, 104 consecutive patients admitted to the coronary care unit with unstable angina during a 6-month period were followed prospectively. Although 58 patients had symptomatic relief with the initiation of intensive medical therapy, 46 (44%) continued to have episodes of angina despite maximal tolerated triple-drug antianginal therapy as well as aspirin or heparin, or both. In-hospital mortality for the 104 patients was 4%. The incidence of myocardial infarction was 8%, and differed (p less than 0.01) for the medically responsive group (3%) vs the medically refractory group (13%). Based on clinical status and coronary anatomy, patients were referred for either bypass surgery (46%), coronary angioplasty (41%) or continued medical therapy (13%). Choice of therapy varied according to the extent of coronary disease, with coronary angioplasty attempted in 72% of patients with 1-vessel disease, 44% of patients with 2-vessel disease and 7% of patients with 3-vessel disease. Angioplasty was performed with an initial success rate of 88%, and compared favorably with bypass surgery in terms of in-hospital mortality (0 vs 11%), late mortality (2.8 vs 7.7%), freedom from angina (62 vs 69%) and subsequent employment (44 vs 27%) at 18 months follow-up. The favorable results of angioplasty in this prospective observational study suggest that additional randomized trials should be conducted in this important patient group. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|