首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

低位直肠癌保肛术与Miles术的远期疗效比较
引用本文:蔡光荣,邵祥麟,李勇,沈宝忠,张申,孙仁刚. 低位直肠癌保肛术与Miles术的远期疗效比较[J]. 中国临床医学, 2004, 11(2): 197-198
作者姓名:蔡光荣  邵祥麟  李勇  沈宝忠  张申  孙仁刚
作者单位:上海市松江区中心医院,上海,201600
摘    要:
目的:比较低位直肠癌保肛术与Miles术的远期疗效。方法:对1994~1998年71例距肛缘5~7cm的低位直肠癌进行回顾性分析。保肛手术组34例,Miles术组37例。结果:保肛组2年局部复发3例(3/34),2年和5年生存率分别为82.4%及61.8%。Miles组局部复发4例(4/37),2年和5年生存率分别为81.1%及56.8%。两组比较均无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:对距肛缘5~7cm的低位直肠癌可行保肛手术,提高生活质量。

关 键 词:低位直肠癌 保肛术 Miles术 复发 手术指征 禁忌证

Comparison of Long Effects between Sphincter-saving Operation and Miles Operation in the Treatment of Low Rectal Carcinoma
Cai Guangrong Shao Xianglin Li Yong,et al.. Comparison of Long Effects between Sphincter-saving Operation and Miles Operation in the Treatment of Low Rectal Carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Medicine, 2004, 11(2): 197-198
Authors:Cai Guangrong Shao Xianglin Li Yong  et al.
Abstract:
Objective:To Compare the long effects between sphincter saving operation and Miles operation in the treatment of low rectal carcinoma. Methods: From 1994 to 1998, 71cases with rectal carcinoma situated 5-7cm from the anus were aualyzed retrospectively. 34cases underwent sphincter_saving operation and 37cases underwent Miles operation, Results: The two-year local recurrence of sphincter-saving operation group and Miles operation group were 3/34 and 4/37. The differenes of 2-year and 5-year survived rate between sphincter-saving group and Miles group was not significant, (82.4% vs81.1%, 61.8% vs 56.8%, P>0.05), Conclusion: The sphincter-saving operation should be feasible in rectal carcinoma situated 5-7cm from the anas and improve life quality.
Keywords:Low rectal carcinoma Sphincter-saving operation Miles operation Survival rate
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号