Lesions produced by the extravasation of urine from the upper urinary tract |
| |
Authors: | R.A. CARR,J. NEWMAN,G.N. ANTONAKOPULOS,& M.C. PARKINSON |
| |
Affiliation: | Departments of Histopathology, United Medical and Dental School, St Thomas' Hospital, London; Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, East Birmingham; Institute of Urology and Nephrology, University College London Medical School and UCL Hospitals Trust, Rockefeller Building, London, UK |
| |
Abstract: | We present six cases which illustrate the spectrum of clinical features, macroscopic findings and light microscopic findings of urine extravasation from the upper urinary tract. The early lesions are characterized macroscopically by an oedematous, glistening or gelatinous appearance to the renal perihilar and peripelvic fat. Light microscopically there is lipolysis with associated foamy macrophages, multinucleate giant cells and lymphocytes. Immunohistochemical staining for Tamm–Horsfall protein is strongly positive in the extracellular space and in the foamy macrophages confirming urine extravazation. Later lesions are characterized by cicatrization of fibrous tissue around the renal pelvis and hydronephrosis. Microscopically there is relatively bland fibrosis with occasional lymphocytes and histiocytic cells. The late lesions are also characterized by extracellular deposits of weakly eosinophilic, granular or hyaline material, the so called 'urinary precipitates'. These deposits stain strongly with diastase PAS and weakly positive for Tamm–Horsfall protein. The staining of these urinary precipitates is analogous to renal tubular hyaline casts, thus supporting the theory that they are derived from uroproteins. We consider that these deposits are pathognomic of past urine extravasation. |
| |
Keywords: | upper urinary tract urine extravasation urinoma Tamm–Horsfall protein |
|
|