Catalyst HD和皮肤标记线肺癌SBRT摆位精度比较

目的 比较光学表面引导放疗系统Catalyst HD和皮肤标记线两种摆位方式在肺癌立体定向放疗(SBRT)中的摆位精度。方法 选取24例SBRT病例,均采用仰卧位和真空垫固定,分别利用Catalyst HD(A组)和皮肤标记线(B组)进行摆位,并通过CBCT和定位CT刚性配准方式获取床左右(x轴向)、升降(y轴向)、进出(z轴向)、床旋转(Rtn)、进出倾斜(Pitch)、左右转动(Roll)配准误差。结果 A组和B组六维度配准误差取绝对值后平均值±标准差依次为(0.13±0.12) cm和(0.25±0.19) cm、(0.26±0.15) cm和(0.13±0.11) cm、(0.23±0.19) cm和(0.35±0.29) cm、(0.43°±0.40°)和(0.80°±0.69°)、(0.48°±0.47°)和(0.79°±0.64°)、(0.62°±0.60°)和(0.88°±0.70°)。上述六组数据正态性检验除B组x轴向外均不服从正态分布,两组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组数据中超限误差(>0.5cm/2°)差异也有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 Catalyst HD方式六维度配准误差均低于标记点方式(y轴向除外),Catalyst HD方式摆位精度优于传统标记点,具有较好临床应用价值。

Comparison of setup accuracy between Catalyst HD and skin markers in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer

Objective To compare the setup accuracy between Catalyst HD and skin markers in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung cancer. Methods A total of 24 cases treated with SBRT were selected and all patients were fixed with vacuum pad in the supine position. Patients in group A were positioned by Catalyst HD and those in group B were positioned by shin markers. All patients were matched with the CT images after CBCT scan by rigid registration and the setup errors in six directions (x-, y-, z-axis, Rtn, Pitch and Roll) were obtained. Results The mean±SD in group A and B in the six directions were as follows:(0.13±0.12) cm,(0.25± 0.19) cm;(0.26±0.15) cm,(0.13±0.11) cm;(0.23±0.19) cm,(0.35±0.29) cm;(0.43°±0.40°),(0.80°±0.69°);(0.48°±0.47°),(0.79°±0.64°);(0.62°±0.60°) and (0.88°±0.70°), respectively. Except the x-axis data in group B, all the data in the six directions were not normally distributed. The obtained data significantly differed between two groups (all P<0.05). The out-of-tolerance errors (>0.5 cm/2°) also significantly differed between two groups (P<0.05). Conclusions The setup errors of Catalyst HD are less than those of the skin markers (except the y-axis). The setup accuracy of Catalyst HD is superior to that of traditional skin markers, which is worthy of application in clinical practice.