极固宁TM、Gluma与NaF治疗牙本质过敏症的临床疗效观察

目的:比较极固宁TM、Gluma、NaF等3种方法治疗牙本质过敏症的临床疗效.方法:选择2003年4月至2004年4月,在本院口腔科门诊就诊的牙本质过敏症患者60例,采用Chiss软件随机分组,三组病例分别采用极固宁TM、Gluma、NaF行牙本质过敏的脱敏治疗.结果:三种方法即刻有效率分别为74.4%、87.5%和94.8%,除极固宁TM组和NaF两组外,组间差异不明显(P＞0.05).治疗1个月和6个月后,极固宁TM组疗效显著优于Gluma组(P<0.01)和NaF组(P<0.01).治疗12个月,除极固宁TM组仍维持77.1%的有效率外,NaF组和Gluma组有效率分别下降到26.4%和43.6%,差异有显著性(P<0.01).结论:三种方法治疗牙本质过敏症均有较好的即刻疗效,但仅极固宁TM组远期疗效较好.

Comparative study of clinical desensitizing effect of Green OrTM, Gluma and NaF

Objective:To compare the clinical effect of three different desensitizing regents: Green OrTM,Gluma and NaF. Methods:60 patients visiting our dental department were randomly divided into three groups, which were treated by Green OrTM,Gluma and NaF respectively. Clinical desensitizing effect was evaluated immediately,1 month,six months and 12 months post treatment. Results:The immediate desensitizing effective rate of three regents was 74.4%, 87.5% and 94.8% respectively(P<0.01). Effective rate of OrTM treatment group kept on 77.1% after 12 month of treatment. But the rate in Gluma group and NaF group reduced to 43.6% and 26.4%. Conclusions: The results suggest that all of the three desensitizers had certain desensitive effect clinically. Green OrTM showed the best prolonged healing effect.