保留并牵张残留纤维的前十字韧带双束重建术

目的 评估在亚急性期进行保留并牵张残留纤维的前十字韧带双束重建的临床效果.方法 2006年1月至2006年6月,对56例前十字韧带损伤患者在亚急性期进行保留并牵张残留纤维的前十字韧带双束重建.前十字韧带双束重建采用四隧道八股肌腱移植的方法.使用PDS缝线穿缝胫骨侧残留纤维,经深束股骨隧道牵张固定.使用IKDC及Lysholm评分标准评估疗效.结果 53例随访2年以上.末次随访时所有患者Lachman试验均为阴性.屈膝25°KT-1000检测结果显示双侧膝关节松弛度差值为(-0.44±1.53)mm,与术前(8.01±1.83)mm比较差异有统计学意义(t=37.03,P=0.0001).29例(54.7%)双侧膝关节松弛度差值小于0mm,提示患膝相对于健侧更为稳定或紧张.24例(45.3%)双侧膝关节松弛度差值为0～2mm.所有患者轴移试验均阴性.48例膝关节活动度正常,2例有5°屈曲受限,1例有小于5°屈曲受限,2例有5°过伸受限.根据IKDC评估标准,51例(96.2%)正常,2例(3.8%)接近正常.IKDC主观评分为(95.6±3.1)分,Lysholm评分为(94.8±2.9)分.受伤前Tegner评分平均为7.3分,末次随访时为7.1分.结论 根据2年以上随访结果,以IKDC为评估标准,保留并牵张残留纤维的前十字韧带双束重建能够使96.2%的患者恢复正常,3.8%的患者接近正常.

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation and tensioning

Objective The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligamen (ACL) reconstruction with remnant preservation and tensioning in acute stage. Methods Fifty-six cases of acute ACL injury were treated with double-bundle ACL reconstruction and tibial remnant preservation and tensioning. The double-bundle reconstruction is performed in a four-tunnel manner with eight-strands of hamstring tendon graft. The tibial remnant was tensioned with PDS sutures pulling through the femoral tunnel for the deep bundle. Fifty-three were followed up for a minimum of two years and evaluat-ed according to IKDC and Lysholm rating scale. Results At the last follow-up, all patients had negative Lachman test. KT-1000 examination in 25° knee flexion showed an average side-to-side difference of anterior laxity of (-0.44±1.53) mm compared with (8.01 1.83) mm before surgery (t=37.03, P=0.0001). Twenty-nine (54.7%) patients showed less than 0 mm side-to-side difference, which indicate a more stable or tight status of the injured knee compared with the normal side; 24(45.3%) patients showed 0 to 2 mm laxity. All patients showed negative pivot shift test. Forty-eight patients showed normal range of motion; 2 patients had 5° flexion deficit, 1 patient had less than 5° flexion deficit and 2 patients had 5° hyper-extension loss. In IKDC e-valuation 51 patients (96.2%) were graded as normal and 2 patients (3.8%) were graded as nearly normal. The IKDC subjective score was 95.6±3.1, and the Lysholm score was 94.8±2.9. The average Tegner score was 7.3 before injury and 7.1 at last follow-up. Conclusion Double-bundle ACL reconstruction with rem-nant preservation and tensioning in acute stage could get 96.2% normal and 3.8% nearly normal rates ac-cording to the IKDC scale at a minimum of two year follow-up.