Comparison of the effects of Bay K 8644 and aortic constriction on regional myocardial blood flow and function in canine nonischemic and ischemic myocardium |
| |
Authors: | C Thuillez A Berdeaux P Duhaze C Bonhenry J F Giudicelli |
| |
Affiliation: | Département de Pharmacologie, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France. |
| |
Abstract: | The effects of Bay K 8644, aortic constriction, and a placebo on regional myocardial blood flows (RMBFs) and contractile function (RCF) were compared in three groups of open-chest anesthetized dogs during coronary stenosis. Bay K 8644 was investigated in two doses: 0.1 micrograms/kg, which exhibited no systemic hemodynamic effect, and 1 microgram/kg, which significantly increased arterial pressure. Aortic constriction was performed to raise afterload to the same extent as Bay K 8644 1 microgram/kg. As compared with placebo, Bay K 8644 0.1 microgram/kg, significantly increased coronary resistance, decreased RMBFs without changing RCF in nonischemic myocardial zones, and affected neither RMBFs nor RCF in ischemic zones. In nonischemic myocardium, Bay K 8644 1 microgram/kg increased RMBFs without affecting RCF, whereas aortic constriction did not modify RMBFs but decreased RCF. In ischemic myocardium, both Bay K 8644 1 microgram/kg and aortic constriction increased RMBFs but did not affect RCF. Thus, the low dose of Bay K 8644 exerts a direct and selective coronary vasoconstrictor effect that has no deleterious consequences on nonischemic RCF. Despite this intrinsic coronary vasoconstrictor effect, the high dose of Bay K 8644 increases RMBFs and maintains RCF in both ischemic and nonischemic zones in relation with the drug-induced increases in coronary perfusion pressure (both zones) and in contractility (nonischemic zones). |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|