首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

硬-腰联合麻醉用于新式剖宫产术中的观察
引用本文:余燕云,徐志勇,张文娟,施勤.硬-腰联合麻醉用于新式剖宫产术中的观察[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2003,22(6):396-398.
作者姓名:余燕云  徐志勇  张文娟  施勤
作者单位:无锡市妇幼保健院,麻醉科,江苏无锡,214002
摘    要:目的比较硬-腰联合麻醉(CSEA)与硬膜外阻滞麻醉(EA)在新式剖宫产术中应用的效果.方法健康足月妊娠产妇2089例,随机分为EA组(1193例)和CSEA组(896例),比较两种麻醉方法的麻醉效果.结果CSEA组阻滞平面达T6的时间、麻醉诱导至胎儿娩出时间、手术至胎儿娩出时间均短于EA组(P<0.05),镇痛效果、肌肉松弛满意率均优于EA组,但低血压发生率高于EA组(P<0.05).结论CSEA用于新式剖宫产术起效快、阻滞完善,但要防范低血压的发生.

关 键 词:硬—腰联合麻醉  新式剖宫产  硬膜外阻滞麻醉  足月妊娠  低血压  镇痛
文章编号:1671-6264(2003)06-0396-03
修稿时间:2003年4月10日

Effect of combined spinal epidural analgesia in Misgav Ladach cesarean section
YU Yan-yun,XU Zhi-yong,ZHANG Wen-juan,SHI Qin.Effect of combined spinal epidural analgesia in Misgav Ladach cesarean section[J].Journal of Southeast Univ: Medical Sci Ed,2003,22(6):396-398.
Authors:YU Yan-yun  XU Zhi-yong  ZHANG Wen-juan  SHI Qin
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of combined spinal epidural analgesia(CSEA)with that of epidural analgesia(EA) in Misgav Ladach cesarean section.Method 2-098 healthy mature pregnant women were randomly assigned to CSEA group(n=1-193)and EA group(n=896). Results The durations from anesthetic induction to delivery were shorter in CSEA group than in EA group(P<0.05). The effects of analgesia and muscular relaxation were better in CSEA group than in EA group. But the incidence of hypotension was higher in CSEA group than in EA group(P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of CSEA in Misgav Ladach cesarean section is better than that of EA, but hypotension should be prevented in CSEA.
Keywords:combined spinal epidural analgesia  epidural analgesia  cesarean section
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号