白内障小切口囊外摘出术与超声乳化吸出术的疗效比较

Objective To compare the effect of extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsification. Methods Three hundred and twenty-six cases (360 eyes) of senile cataract were divided into two groups by random digits table with 163 cases (180 eyes) in each. One group underwent phacoemulsification (phacoemulsification group),and the other group underwent extracapsular cataract extraction with small incision(no-phacoemulsifieation group). A comparison was carried out between the two groups of the vision and complications after operation. Results In phacoemulsification group,7 d after operation 18.33%(33/180)had 0.4 or less in vision,66.11%( 119/180) were 0.5-0.9,15.56%(28/180) were 1.0 or better. In no-phacoemulsification group,7 d after operation, 18.89% (34/180) were 0.4 or less in vision,66.67% (120/180) were 0.5-0.9,14.44% (26/180) were 1.0 or better. During operation,posterior capsular ruptured and vitreous prolapsed in 4.44% (8/180) in phacoemulsification group and 3.33%(6/180) in no-phacoemulsification group. Corneal edema:there were 16.11%(29/180) in phacoemulsification group and 17.22%(31/180) in no-phacoemulsification group. The curative effect between the two kinds of operation mentioned above was almost the same and had no significant difference (P ＞0.05). Conclusion The no-phacoemulsification is simple and economical, wihch is suitable for basic hospitals.

Comparison of clinical efficacy of small incision extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsification