首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

老年人腹腔镜与剖腹胆囊切除术临床分析
引用本文:黄坚,蔡秀军.老年人腹腔镜与剖腹胆囊切除术临床分析[J].全科医学临床与教育,2009,7(3):216-217,223.
作者姓名:黄坚  蔡秀军
作者单位:1. 金华市中医院外科
2. 浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院普外科,浙江杭州,310016
摘    要:目的比较老年人胆囊良性疾病行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与剖腹胆囊切除术(OC)的临床效果。方法对120例60岁以上的老年病人行LC,并与同期行OC的56例老年病人临床资料进行回顾性对比分析。结果两组病人均无手术死亡及严重并发症发生,LC组平均手术时间、术中出血量、肠功能恢复时间以及术后平均住院天数均较OC组低,差异有统计学意义(t分别=2.36、2.26、2.88、2.47,P均〈0.05)。结论LC创伤小、恢复快、安全可靠,疗效明显优于OC,应作为老年人胆囊良性疾病行胆囊切除术的首选术式。

关 键 词:老年人  腹腔镜  胆囊切除术  剖腹术

Comparison between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparotomy in elderly patients
HUANG Jian,CAI Xiujun.Comparison between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparotomy in elderly patients[J].clinical education of general practice,2009,7(3):216-217,223.
Authors:HUANG Jian  CAI Xiujun
Institution:. (Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China)
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical values between laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC) in elderly patients. Method Patients over 60 years old undergoing cholecystectomy were investigated and were divided into two groups. Group LC (n=120) was performed under laparoscopic procedure, group OC (n-56) under open procedure. Results Compared with the OC group, the mean average operation time, blood lost, the peristaltic sound recovery time and the length of postoperative stay in the LC group were much less (t= 2.36,2.26,2.88,2.47,P〈 0.05 ). There was no serious postoperative complications and no death in both groups. Conclusions LC is an effective, safe and minimally invasive operation, and it is superior to OC for the old people.
Keywords:elderly patients  laparoscopy  cholecystectomy  laparotomy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号