首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

左旋氨氯地平联合一线降压药治疗高血压疗效的系统评价
引用本文:蔡旭阳,吴斌,金朝辉,杨甜,徐珽.左旋氨氯地平联合一线降压药治疗高血压疗效的系统评价[J].中国医院药学杂志,2019,39(2):173-177.
作者姓名:蔡旭阳  吴斌  金朝辉  杨甜  徐珽
作者单位:1. 四川大学华西医院临床药学部, 四川 成都, 610041; 2. 四川大学华西药学院, 四川 成都, 610041
基金项目:2017年四川省医学会高血压疾病(施慧达)专项科研课题(编号:2017SHD005)
摘    要:目的:系统评价左旋氨氯地平联合一线降压药治疗高血压的疗效,为临床提供循证依据。方法:计算机检索Ovid Medline、EMBase、Cochrane Library、CNKI、CBM、VIP和WanFang Data,检索时限均从建库至2017年12月,对每项纳入研究进行偏倚风险评价,并采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入147个RCTs,Meta分析结果显示:(1)左旋氨氯地平联合ACEI在SBP降低值SMD=0.92,95% CI(0.79,1.04),P < 0.000 01],DBP降低值SMD=0.87,95% CI(0.72,1.03),P < 0.000 01]和总有效率RR=1.23,95% CI(1.20,1.26),P < 0.000 01]方面均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义;(2)左旋氨氯地平联合ARB在SBP降低值SMD=1.29,95% CI(1.10,1.48),P < 0.000 01],DBP降低值SMD=0.94,95% CI(0.79,1.09),P < 0.000 01]和总有效率RR=1.22,95% CI(1.20,1.25),P < 0.000 01]方面均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义;(3)左旋氨氯地平联合β受体拮抗剂在SBP降低值SMD=0.88,95% CI(0.39,1.36),P=0.000 5],DBP降低值SMD=0.80,95% CI(0.35,1.25),P=0.000 5]和总有效率RR=1.18,95% CI(1.12,1.23),P < 0.000 01]方面优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义;(4)左旋氨氯地平联合利尿剂在SBP降低值SMD=1.34,95% CI(0.78,1.90),P < 0.000 01],DBP降低值SMD=0.72,95% CI(0.20,1.24),P=0.007]方面优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义。结论:基于现有临床证据,左旋氨氯地平联合一线降压药降压效果优于单一用药方案。

关 键 词:左旋氨氯地平  高血压  随机对照试验  系统评价  
收稿时间:2018-05-27

Efficacy of levamlodipin combined first-line hypotensor in treatment of hypertension: a systematic review
CAI Xu-yang,WU Bin,JIN Zhao-hui,YANG Tian,XU Ting.Efficacy of levamlodipin combined first-line hypotensor in treatment of hypertension: a systematic review[J].Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy,2019,39(2):173-177.
Authors:CAI Xu-yang  WU Bin  JIN Zhao-hui  YANG Tian  XU Ting
Institution:1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan Chengdu, 610041, China; 2. West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Sichuan Chengdu, 610041, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the efficacy of levamlodipin combined first-line hypotensor in hypertension patients.METHODS Databases of Ovid Medline, EMBase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang were searched. The retrieval time was from inception to December 2017. Each included study was assessed for methodological quality, then analyzed by Rev Man5.3 software.RESULTS A total of 147 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, levamlodipin-ACEI combination group was superior to control group with significant differences in decreased value of SBPSMD=0.92, 95% CI (0.79, 1.04), P < 0.000 01], DBPSMD=0.87, 95% CI (0.72, 1.03), P < 0.000 01] and total effective rateRR=1.23, 95% CI (1.20, 1.26), P < 0.000 01], while levamlodipin-ARB combination group was superior to control group with significant differences in decreased value of SBPSMD=1.29, 95% CI (1.10,1.48), P < 0.000 01], DBPSMD=0.94, 95% CI (0.79, 1.09), P < 0.000 01] and total effective rateRR=1.22, 95% CI (1.20, 1.25), P < 0.000 01]. Levamlodipin combined beta-blockers were superior to control group in decreased value of SBPSMD=0.88, 95% CI (0.39, 1.36), P=0.000 5], DBPSMD=0.80, 95% CI (0.35, 1.25), P=0.000 5] and total effective rateRR=1.18, 95% CI (1.12, 1.23), P < 0.000 01]. Levamlodipin combined diuretics was superior to control group in decreased value of SBPSMD=1.34, 95% CI (0.78, 1.90), P < 0.000 01], and DBPSMD=0.72, 95% CI (0.20, 1.24), P=0.007].CONCLUSION According to the current clinical evidence, levamlodipin combined first-line hypotensor has advantage over single administration.
Keywords:levamlodipin  hypertension  randomized controlled trials  systematic review  
点击此处可从《中国医院药学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医院药学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号