Effective and Safe Anesthesia for Yorkshire and Yucatan Swine with and without Cardiovascular Injury and Intervention

The goal of this study was to identify an injectable anesthetic protocol that provides sedation sufficient for peripheral vascular catheterization, intubation, and transport while minimizing cardiovascular changes in Yorkshire and Yucatan pigs with and without cardiovascular injury and intervention (CI). Phase 1 examined the safety and efficacy of acepromazine–ketamine, diazepam–ketamine, midazolam–ketamine, and medetomidine–ketamine in 5 healthy Yorkshire pigs. For each drug combination, we obtained multiple measurements of heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, sedation score, ability to catheterize and intubate, and recovery score. Phase 2 evaluated and refined the dose of the most effective Phase 1 anesthetic combination (midazolam–ketamine) in healthy and CI Yorkshire pigs (n = 53 trials). Phase 3 mirrored Phase 2 but tested midazolam–ketamine in healthy and CI Yucatan pigs (n = 34 trials). Midazolam (0.5 mg/kg)–ketamine (25 to 27 mg/kg) was the most effective anesthetic combination in healthy Yorkshire pigs, but this dose was less effective in healthy Yucatan pigs and CI Yorkshire and Yucatan pigs. Midazolam–ketamine resulted in tachycardia and apnea more frequently in CI pigs than healthy pigs. This combination also caused vomiting in one CI Yucatan pig. Overall, midazolam–ketamine provided safe and effective sedation for catheterization and intubation of both healthy and CI pigs. This study suggests Yucatan pigs may require a higher dose midazolam–ketamine to achieve the same level of sedation as that in Yorkshire pigs. Although anesthetic complication rates were higher in CI pigs, our results indicate that midazolam–ketamine can be safely used for sedation of both pig breeds with and without CI.Abbreviation: CI, cardiovascular injury and interventionPigs (Sus scrofa) are common models of cardiovascular injury and intervention (CI) that largely have replaced traditional canine cardiology models. Advantages of swine compared with dogs include anatomic and physiologic characteristics similar to humans, such as similar coronary artery distribution and effective collateralized blood flow to the myocardium after coronary artery blockage.²³ However, pigs are difficult to restrain and anesthetize due to their size and resistance to sedative drug combinations, including those with morphine.²⁴ Injectable sedative drugs may result in cardiovascular and respiratory effects such as increased cardiac work and oxygen consumption, tachycardia, bradycardia, apnea, hypertension, and hypotension.^{5,6,8-12,14,19,20,25-29} These side effects can pose considerable problems for CI pigs, and anesthesia protocols with minimal effects on cardiovascular function are needed. A literature review revealed no published studies of anesthetic protocols in swine with existing cardiovascular injury; published research is limited to investigating anesthesia protocols for experimental induction of CI or determining in vitro and in vivo drug effects on healthy cardiovascular systems.^{4-6,8-12,14,19-21,25-29} Other published studies have limited investigations to studying sedative and physiologic effects in healthy Yorkshire, Yucatan, mixed-breed, Landrace, and Gottingen miniature swine.^{2,3,10,13,17,18,20-22}We conducted the current study to address the need for a systematic investigation of anesthetic protocols in CI Yorkshire and Yucatan pigs. The goals of this study were to determine an injectable-only anesthetic protocol for both Yorkshire and Yucatan pigs that yielded sufficient sedation for peripheral vascular catheterization, sufficient duration for transport, and minimal cardiovascular effects while being safe and effective for CI pigs.