首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Liver frailty and all-cause mortality in the older participants of the Salus in Apulia Study
Authors:Zupo  Roberta  Castellana  Fabio  Donghia  Rossella  Lampignano  Luisa  Guerra  Vito  De Pergola  Giovanni  Lozupone  Madia  Bortone  Ilaria  De Nucci  Sara  Tatoli  Rossella  Tirelli  Sarah  Sborgia  Giancarlo  Giannelli  Gianluigi  Panza  Francesco  Sardone  Rodolfo
Affiliation:1.Unit of Data Sciences and Technology Innovation for Population Health, National Institute of Gastroenterology “Saverio de Bellis,” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
;2.Unit of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, National Institute of Gastroenterology “Saverio de Bellis,” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
;3.Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
;4.Scientific Direction, National Institute of Gastroenterology “Saverio de Bellis,” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
;
Abstract:

The liver contribution to the biological network underlying physical frailty in aging is underestimated. How best to measure this contribution magnitude and impact on health risk trajectories in frail individuals is not yet entirely clear. We analyzed the association of a novel liver frailty phenotype with the risk of death in older participants of the Salus in Apulia Study cohort. Clinical and physical examination, routine biomarkers, medical history, and anthropometry were analyzed in 1929 older adults (65?+). Physical frailty was classified by Cardiovascular Health Study criteria, and liver fibrosis risk by fibrosis-4 (FIB-4). The liver frailty phenotype was defined as physical frailty plus high-risk liver fibrosis (score?>?2.67). Physical frailty, high-risk liver fibrosis, and liver frailty subjects were compared to subjects without these conditions (non-frail). Proportional Cox regression tested the adjusted association between liver frailty and all-cause mortality for each category. The liver frailty prevalence was relatively low (3.8%), but higher in men (58.1%). Compared to non-frail older subjects, liver frailty subjects were significantly older (effect size (ES)???1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI)???1.35 to???0.87), with a lower education (ES 0.48, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.71) and higher multimorbidity (ES 15.81, 95%CI 4.20 to 27.41). Cox multivariate analyses showed a two-fold increased risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio 2.09, 95%CI 1.16–3.74) even after the adjustment for age, sex, education, and alcohol consumption. The liver frailty phenotype runs twice the risk of overall mortality compared with the non-frail population. This clinical tool, validated in a Southern Italian population, is based on simple sets of measures that can conveniently be assessed also in the primary care setting.

Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号