首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

依普罗沙坦与氯沙坦在轻中度原发性高血压病人中的降压疗效比较
引用本文:孔燕,初少莉,陈绍行,杜俭,吴顺娣,胡亚蓉,朱鼎良.依普罗沙坦与氯沙坦在轻中度原发性高血压病人中的降压疗效比较[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2007,26(2):131-134.
作者姓名:孔燕  初少莉  陈绍行  杜俭  吴顺娣  胡亚蓉  朱鼎良
作者单位:上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院高血压科,上海,200025
摘    要:目的:以氯沙坦为对照,观察依普罗沙坦治疗轻、中度原发性高血压(EH)病人的疗效与安全性。方法:采用前瞻性、随机、双盲、阳性药对照研究。符合方案的50例轻、中度EH病人经筛选期(2 wk)、安慰剂导入期(2 wk)后,随机分为依普罗沙坦组(n=24)与氯沙坦组(n=26)。在治疗期,2组病人分别每日1次口服依普罗沙坦600 mg或氯沙坦50 mg。若4 wk血压不达标,即坐位舒张压(DBP)≥90 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 3 kPa),加氢氯噻嗪12.5 mg,每日1次口服至8 wk。观察治疗前、治疗后4 wk与8 wk血压、心率以及治疗前后血、尿常规,血生化及心电图改变。结果:在治疗后8 wk,依普罗沙坦组的收缩压(SBP)与DBP分别下降了(12±s 10)mmHg与(12±5)mmHg,氯沙坦组的降压幅度分别为(14±9)mmHg与(10±6)mmHg,治疗前后比较有非常显著差异(P<0.01);但2组间血压下降的幅度无显著差异(P>0.05)。依普罗沙坦组与氯沙坦组的降压总有效率分别为100%和8l%,2组疗效无显著差异(P>0.05)。依普罗沙坦组加用氢氯噻嗪病例为9例(38%),而氯沙坦组为6例(23%),p> 0.05。2组心率及血液生化检查结果,治疗前后变化均无显著意义(P>0.05),均无严重不良反应发生。结论:依普罗沙坦与氯沙坦均能有效降低轻、中度EH病人的血压,疗效相似,都具有良好的安全性。

关 键 词:高血压  抗高血压药  氯沙坦  依普罗沙坦  血管紧张肽Ⅱ受体拮抗利
文章编号:1007-7669(2007)02-0131-04
收稿时间:2006-03-27
修稿时间:2006-03-272006-12-12

Comparison of eprosartan and losartan in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension
KONG Yan,CHU Shao-li,CHEN Shao-hang,DU Jian,WU Shun-di,HU Ya-rong,ZHU Ding-liang.Comparison of eprosartan and losartan in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension[J].Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies,2007,26(2):131-134.
Authors:KONG Yan  CHU Shao-li  CHEN Shao-hang  DU Jian  WU Shun-di  HU Ya-rong  ZHU Ding-liang
Abstract:AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eprosartan and losartan in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 50 patients with sitting DBP≥90 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 3 kPa) at the end of 2 wk placebo wash-out period were randomized into eprosartan group (n = 24) or losartan group (re = 26). The patients received eprosartan (600 mg, qd) or losartan (50 mg, qd) for 4 wk. Patients with an unsatisfactory blood pressure response (sitting DBP≥90 mmHg) were administrated with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg until 8 wk. Blood pressure and heart rate were observed and laboratory parameters such as blood and urine routine, hepato-renal function, fasting blood glucose, lipid profile and serum electrolytes were tested at baseline and the end of treatment. RESULTS: The total effective rates were 100 % in eprosartan group and 81 % in losartan group, respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). At 8 wk, the reductions of SBP and DBP were (12±s 10) mmHg and (12±5) mmHg in eprosartan group and (14±9) mmHg and (10±6) mmHg in losartan group (P > 0.05). There were significant differences before and after treatment in both groups (P < 0.01), with no difference in reduction of blood pressure between two groups (P > 0.05). At 4 wk, 9 patients in eprosartan group and 6 ones in losartan group were administrated with hydrochlorothiazide. No significant changes were found in laboratory test and heart rate, and no severe adverse events were observed within 8wk in both groups. CONCLUSION: Eprosartan and losartan are both equally effective and safe in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
Keywords:hypertension  antihypertensive agents  losartan  eprosartan  angiotensionⅡreceptor antagonist
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号