内固定与非内固定治疗胸腰段脊柱结核的比较研究

目的 对比研究单纯植骨和内固定治疗胸腰段脊柱结核的疗效，探讨胸腰段结桉外科治疗中一期前路病灶清除植骨内固定的可行性及其治疗效果。方法 采用一期前路病灶清除，单纯植骨融合治疗胸腰段脊柱结核患者25例，植骨内固定治疗21例，对比观察术后植骨融合、畸形矫正及结核病灶愈合情况。结果 平均随访2年2个月，43倒患者获访，两组患者脊柱结核均治愈，植骨全部骨性融合。内固定组融合时间短，畸形矫正效果好，无明显矫正角丢失，优良率95％，非内固定组73．9％。结论 一期前路病灶清除植骨内固定．既可彻底清除痛灶、矫形．并能重建脊柱的即刻稳定性．其疗效的优良率明显高干非内固定组。

Comparative Research of Interfixation and Non-interfixation Applied to Treate the Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

Objective Compare the curative effect of simply bone grafting with bone grafting, sequentially or simultaneously instrumentation planting in surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis,to verify the possibility and curative effect of radical debridement,bone grafting, sequentially or simultaneously instrumentation planting.Methods Twenty-five cases were treated with radical debridement,bone grafting,21 patients with sequentially or simultaneously instrumentation planting.Evaluating the bony fusion rate,correction of deformity and the status of lesion contrastively.Results Forty-three patients were followed-up for an average of 21 monthes,all of them were cured and shown bony union. With instrumentation we got shorter bony union,better correction and no obviously correction lost.Conclusion Radical debridement,bone grafting, sequentially or simultaneously instrumentation planting can offer a complete removal of lesion as well as restruction of spinal stability which make the local immobilization possible.Through this procedure ,early rehabilitation will be possible and the cure rate fo spinal tuberculosis increased.