首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

结肠癌肝转移细胞增殖能力减弱
引用本文:刘坤,王常刚,蔡健华,吕波,万方军,赵任. 结肠癌肝转移细胞增殖能力减弱[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2011, 28(3). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2011.03.030
作者姓名:刘坤  王常刚  蔡健华  吕波  万方军  赵任
作者单位:上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院普外科,200025
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目
摘    要:
目的 通过阶梯转移法在裸鼠中筛选出人结肠癌肝转移细胞,然后对结肠癌肝转移细胞的生长增殖能力进行鉴定.方法 通过SW1116细胞株裸鼠皮下连续5次传代后取皮下种植瘤裸鼠结肠原位种植,分别取肝脏转移灶和皮下5代细胞进行原代培养,获得大肠癌肝转移细胞和皮下5代的原代细胞,分别命名为结直肠癌肝转移细胞1代(CHM-1)和皮下第5代(P5),通过CCK-8测生长曲线、流式检测细胞周期以及细胞周期相关的蛋白的免疫细胞化学来对SW1116、CHM-1和P5增殖能力进行检测.结果 细胞增殖实验显示CHM-1生长速度明显慢于SW1116和P5细胞(P<0.05);流式细胞周期分析中CHM-1细胞G41期(68.390±2.865)%比例高于SW1116(50.440±1.472)%和P5(53.930±2.651)%(P<0.05),G2期CHM-19(13.530±4.411)%比例要低于SW1116(32.030±5.645)%和P5(29.720±3.559)%(P<0.05),S期3种细胞差异无统计学意义(18.250±6.901)%、(19.050±4.162)%、(18.930±0.169)%(P>0.05);免疫细胞化学分析发现细胞周期蛋白Cyclin DI在CHM-1(23.7±4.7)%中的表达比SW1116(30.2±5.1)%和P5(32.1±4.2)%减少(P<0.05).结论 发现侵袭能力和生长增殖能力具有反向关联,即结肠癌肝转移细胞具有更强的侵袭能力,但生长增殖速度比其他细胞更慢.
Abstract:
Objective To study the proliferation ability of liver metastatic colorectal cancer cells by establishing stepwise metastatic colorectal carcinoma cell model via in vivo selection.Methods SW1116 cells were transplanted into the subcutis of nude mice and serially passaged for 5 times,and then the subcutaneous tumor was implanted into the cecal wall of new nude mice.The liver metastatic lesions and the subcutaneous carcinoma cells of the fifth generation were picked for primary culture.Two cell lines named CHM-1 and P5 were obtained.Proliferation levels were analyzed by testing of cell growth curve,cell cycle analyses by flow cytometry and Cyclin D1 analysis by immunocytochemistry.Results CHM-1 grew much slower than P5 and SW 1116 although there was no difference between P5 and SW 1116 in cell proliferation assay ( P<0.05 ).Cell cycle analysis revealed that the percentage of cells in G0/G1 phase was higher (P<0.05) in CHM-1 (68.390 ±2.865)% than in SW1116 (50.440 ± 1.472)% and P5 (53.930 ± 2.651)%,but that in G2/M phase was lower ( P<0.05 ) in CHM-1 ( 13.530 ± 4.411 )% than in SW1116 (32.030 ±5.645)% and P5 (29.720 ±3.559)% rough there was no difference in S phase ( 18.250 ± 6.901 )%,( 19.050 ± 4.162 )%,( 18.930 ± 0.169 )% ( P > 0.05 ).The expression of cell cycle proteins Cyclin D1 was decreased ( P<0.05 ) in CHM-1 ( 23.7 ± 4.7 )% as compared with thoseinP5(32.1±4.2)% and SW1116 (30.2 ±5.1)%.Conclusion In the same cell line,there was a reverse relationship between the ability of invasion and proliferation.

关 键 词:结直肠癌  增殖  转移  细胞周期

Alleviated proliferation in liver metastatic colorectal cancer cells
LIU Kun,WANG Chang-gang,CAI Jian-hua,L Bo,WAN Fang-jun,ZHAO Ren. Alleviated proliferation in liver metastatic colorectal cancer cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery, 2011, 28(3). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2011.03.030
Authors:LIU Kun  WANG Chang-gang  CAI Jian-hua  L Bo  WAN Fang-jun  ZHAO Ren
Affiliation:LIU Kun,WANG Chang-gang,CAI Jian-hua,L(U) Bo,WAN Fang-jun,ZHAO Ren
Abstract:
Objective To study the proliferation ability of liver metastatic colorectal cancer cells by establishing stepwise metastatic colorectal carcinoma cell model via in vivo selection.Methods SW1116 cells were transplanted into the subcutis of nude mice and serially passaged for 5 times,and then the subcutaneous tumor was implanted into the cecal wall of new nude mice.The liver metastatic lesions and the subcutaneous carcinoma cells of the fifth generation were picked for primary culture.Two cell lines named CHM-1 and P5 were obtained.Proliferation levels were analyzed by testing of cell growth curve,cell cycle analyses by flow cytometry and Cyclin D1 analysis by immunocytochemistry.Results CHM-1 grew much slower than P5 and SW 1116 although there was no difference between P5 and SW 1116 in cell proliferation assay ( P<0.05 ).Cell cycle analysis revealed that the percentage of cells in G0/G1 phase was higher (P<0.05) in CHM-1 (68.390 ±2.865)% than in SW1116 (50.440 ± 1.472)% and P5 (53.930 ± 2.651)%,but that in G2/M phase was lower ( P<0.05 ) in CHM-1 ( 13.530 ± 4.411 )% than in SW1116 (32.030 ±5.645)% and P5 (29.720 ±3.559)% rough there was no difference in S phase ( 18.250 ± 6.901 )%,( 19.050 ± 4.162 )%,( 18.930 ± 0.169 )% ( P > 0.05 ).The expression of cell cycle proteins Cyclin D1 was decreased ( P<0.05 ) in CHM-1 ( 23.7 ± 4.7 )% as compared with thoseinP5(32.1±4.2)% and SW1116 (30.2 ±5.1)%.Conclusion In the same cell line,there was a reverse relationship between the ability of invasion and proliferation.
Keywords:Colorectal carcinoma  Proliferation  Metastasis  Cell cycle
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号