Differences Among Outcome Measures in Occupational Low Back Pain |
| |
Authors: | Sue?A.?Ferguson mailto:Ferguson.@osu.edu" title=" Ferguson.@osu.edu" itemprop=" email" data-track=" click" data-track-action=" Email author" data-track-label=" " >Email author,William?S.?Marras,Deborah?L.?Burr |
| |
Affiliation: | Biodynamics Laboratory, Institute for Ergonomics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. Ferguson.4@osu.edu |
| |
Abstract: | The rate of recurrence in low back pain patients has been reported as high as 70%; therefore, it is believed that researchers have a poor understanding of low back pain recovery. To enhance our understanding of recovery, a large cross-sectional study was conducted to compare outcome measures of return to work, impairment of activities of daily living, pain symptoms, and functional performance probability. A total of 208 workers were examined. The percentage of workers recovered based on return to work criteria was 99% compared to 25% for impairment of activities of daily living, 17% for symptoms, and 12.5% for functional performance probability. Single functional performance measures of range of motion, velocity, and acceleration had recovery rates of 59, 13, and 10%, respectively. It appears that all these criteria are measuring very different parameters of low back pain recovery. The residual loss in functional performance may indicate a decreased tolerance to physical demand providing potential insight for why recurrent low back pain rates are high. |
| |
Keywords: | outcome return to work low back pain functional impairment |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|