首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

北京市350名职业人员睡眠质量和情绪调节的认知策略调查
引用本文:夏宇欣,周仁来. 北京市350名职业人员睡眠质量和情绪调节的认知策略调查[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2010, 43(4). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7884.2010.04.011
作者姓名:夏宇欣  周仁来
作者单位:北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,100875
基金项目:长江学者和创新团队发展计划,北京师范大学自主科研基金,国家"973"计划 
摘    要:目的 了解受过高等教育职员的睡眠质量及其所采用的情绪调节认知策略.方法 采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)问卷、失眠严重指数(ISI)问卷、简式简明心境问卷(POMS-SF)和认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ),对采取整群随机抽样法抽取的北京市6所单位的350名大专以上在职人员的睡眠质量与情绪调节策略进行调查.结果 (1)98例(28%)存在睡眠质量问题(PSQI≥7分),146例(41.7%)日常状态受失眠影响(ISI>7分);(2)遭遇负性生活事件后,在所有受访人员中使用频率最高的3种情绪调节策略依次为积极重新评价、重新关注计划、积极重新关注;(3)在情绪调节认知策略的灾难化维度上,主观不失眠组(ISI≤7分)得分(34.21±12.85)分,低于轻度失眠组(7分<ISI≤14分)[(39.62±15.02)分]与中重度失眠组(ISI≥15分)[(41.48±11.25)分],差异有统计学意义(t=3.466,P=0.001;t=2.625,P=0.009);在沉浸维度上,主观不失眠组得分(46.43±12.78)分,低于轻度失眠组[(49.92±13.55)分]与中重度失眠组[(51.67±11.44)分],差异有统计学意义(t=2.332,P=0.020;t=1.974,P=0.049).结论 受访职员睡眠质量问题及主观失眠现象较多见,多能运用积极认知策略调节情绪;主观失眠组职员有更多灾难化、沉浸的消极认知策略的运用.

关 键 词:入睡和睡眠障碍  情绪  认知

Sleep quality and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in occupational persons
XIA Yu-xin,ZHOU Ren-lai. Sleep quality and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in occupational persons[J]. Chinese Journal of Psychiatry, 2010, 43(4). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7884.2010.04.011
Authors:XIA Yu-xin  ZHOU Ren-lai
Abstract:Objective To investigate the sleep quality and the cognitive emotion regulation strategies of highly educated professionals. Methods Totally 350 adults from different units in Beijing completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ( PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index ( ISI), Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS-SF) and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). Results ( 1 ) Among these adults, 98 ( 28% ) had sleep problems ( PSQI ≥ 7 ), 146 ( 41.7% ) were influenced by insomnia. (2) After encountering negative events in daily life, the strategies frequently used by these 350 adults included positive reappraisal, refocusing on planning and positive refocusing. (3) There are significant difference between those three groups in different ISI degree on the dimensions of catastrophizing and rumination. Specifically, sleep good group (ISI ≤ 7 ) is significant lower than mild insomnia group (7 < ISI≤14)and severe insomnia group( ISI ≥ 15 ) at the mean score of catastrophizing ( t = 3.466, P =0.001; t = 2.625, P = 0.009 ) and mean score of rumination ( t = 2.332, P = 0.020; t = 1.974, P = 0.049 ).Conclusions The results suggest there be much sleep quality problem and subjective insomnia in these staff members. In face of negative life events, these staff usually use positive strategies to regulate their emotion, and those people affected by insomnia frequently use the strategies of rumination and catastrophizing more than those who are not suffered insomnia.
Keywords:Insomnia  Emotions  Cognition
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号