Factors influencing physical activity and rehabilitation in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies |
| |
Authors: | Selina M. Parry Laura D. Knight Bronwen Connolly Claire Baldwin Zudin Puthucheary Peter Morris Jessica Mortimore Nicholas Hart Linda Denehy Catherine L. Granger |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences,The University of Melbourne,Melbourne,Australia;2.Department of Physiotherapy,Royal Melbourne Hospital,Melbourne,Australia;3.Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre,London,UK;4.Centre of Human and Aerospace Physiological Sciences,King’s College London,London,UK;5.Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre,Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust,London,UK;6.International Centre for Allied Health Evidence (iCAHE) and the Sansom Institute,University of South Australia,Adelaide,Australia;7.Division of Critical Care, Institute of Sports and Exercise Health,University College Hospitals,London,UK;8.Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology,King’s College London,London,UK;9.Department of Critical Care,University of Kentucky,Lexington,USA;10.Institute for Breathing and Sleep,Melbourne,Australia |
| |
Abstract: |
PurposeTo identify, evaluate and synthesise studies examining the barriers and enablers for survivors of critical illness to participate in physical activity in the ICU and post-ICU settings from the perspective of patients, caregivers and healthcare providers.MethodsSystematic review of articles using five electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus. Quantitative and qualitative studies that were published in English in a peer-reviewed journal and assessed barriers or enablers for survivors of critical illness to perform physical activity were included. Prospero ID: CRD42016035454.ResultsEighty-nine papers were included. Five major themes and 28 sub-themes were identified, encompassing: (1) patient physical and psychological capability to perform physical activity, including delirium, sedation, illness severity, comorbidities, weakness, anxiety, confidence and motivation; (2) safety influences, including physiological stability and concern for lines, e.g. risk of dislodgement; (3) culture and team influences, including leadership, interprofessional communication, administrative buy-in, clinician expertise and knowledge; (4) motivation and beliefs regarding the benefits/risks; and (5) environmental influences, including funding, access to rehabilitation programs, staffing and equipment.ConclusionsThe main barriers identified were patient physical and psychological capability to perform physical activity, safety concerns, lack of leadership and ICU culture of mobility, lack of interprofessional communication, expertise and knowledge, and lack of staffing/equipment and funding to provide rehabilitation programs. Barriers and enablers are multidimensional and span diverse factors. The majority of these barriers are modifiable and can be targeted in future clinical practice. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|