Adherence to transition guidelines in European paediatric nephrology units |
| |
Authors: | Thomas A. Forbes Alan R. Watson Aleksandra Zurowska Rukshana Shroff Sevcan Bakkaloglu Karel Vondrak Michel Fischbach Johan Van de Walle Gema Ariceta Alberto Edefonti Christoph Aufricht Augustina Jankauskiene Tuula Holta Mesiha Ekim Claus Peter Schmitt Constantinos Stefanidis European Paediatric Dialysis Working Group |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Nottingham Children’s Hospital, Children’s Renal and Urology Unit, QMC Campus, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2. Gdansk University Hospital Medical School, Gdansk, Poland 3. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK 4. Gazi University Hospital, Gazi, Turkey 5. University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic 6. Hospital Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France 7. University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium 8. Hospital Cruces, Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain 9. Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico, Pediatrica DeMarchi, Milan, Italy 10. University Hospital for Pediatrics, Vienna, Austria 11. Vilnius University Children’s Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania 12. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 13. Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey 14. Centre for Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany 15. Children’s Hospital, A & P Kyriakou, Athens, Greece
|
| |
Abstract: |
Background There is increasing focus on the problems involved in the transition and transfer of young adult patients from paediatric to adult renal units. This situation was addressed by the 2011 International Pediatric Nephrology Association/International Society of Nephrology (IPNA/ISN) Consensus Statement on transition. Methods We performed a survey of transition practices of 15 paediatric nephrology units across Europe 2 years after publication of the consensus statement. Results Two thirds of units were aware of the guidelines, and one third had integrated them into their transition practice. Forty-seven per cent of units transfer five or fewer patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 per year to a median of five adult centres, with higher numbers of CKD stages 2–4 patients. Seventy-three per cent of units were required by the hospital or government to transfer patients by a certain age. Eighty per cent of units commenced transition planning after the patient turned 15 years of age and usually within 1–2 years of the compulsory transfer age. Forty-seven per cent of units used a transition or transfer clinic. Prominent barriers to effective transition were patient and parent attachment to the paediatric unit and difficulty in allowing the young person to perform self-care. Conclusions Whereas awareness of the consensus statement is suboptimal, it has had some impact on practice. Adult nephrologists receive transferred patients infrequently, and the process of transition is introduced too late by paediatricians. Government- and hospital-driven age-based transfer policies distract focus from the achievement of competencies in self care. Variable use of transition clinics, written patient information and support groups is probably due to economic and human-resource limitations. The consensus statement provides a standard for evolving and evaluating transition policies jointly agreed upon by paediatric and adult units. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|