Additional Value of Pulmonary Vein Parameters in Defining Pseudonormalization of Mitral Inflow Pattern |
| |
Authors: | Andrea Rossi M.D. Latina Loredana M.D. Mariantonietta Cicoira M.D. Stefano Bonapace M.D. Luisa Zanolla M.D. Piero Zardini M.D. Giorgio Golia M.D. |
| |
Affiliation: | Division of Cardiology, University of Verona, Ospedale Maggiore, P. le Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy. arossi@cardiovr.univr.it |
| |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: An echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is still challenging when identifying a pseudonormal mitral pattern (PSE) in an unselected population. The present study analyzed and compared the accuracy of various parameters in correctly identifying a PSE pattern in patients with a broad range of ejection fraction (EF) and degree of mitral regurgitation. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with E/A > or = 1 and an invasive determination of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were enrolled in the study. Mitral E wave (E(max)) and A (A(max)) velocities, E (DTe) and A (DTa) deceleration times, pulmonary vein systolic and diastolic velocities, and time velocity integrals were measured. The different duration between mitral and pulmonary vein A wave (A'-A) also was calculated. E(max) and E/A during Valsalva maneuver were measured and expressed as percentage compared with baseline. LV end-diastolic (LVD), end-systolic (LVS), and EF were measured from the apical four-chambers view (area-length method). Left atrial end-systolic (LA(max)) and end-diastolic (LA(min)) were measured from the apical four- and two-chambers views (area-length method). Left atrial filling volume (LA(fill)) was the difference between LA(max) and LA(min). Mitral regurgitant volume was estimated by the following equation: MR(vol) = 6.18 + (1.01 * LA(fill)) - (0.783 * PVs %). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (age: 55 +/- 21 years; 75% male) had LVEDP < or = 18 mmHg and were classified as normal mitral pattern (Group 1). Fifty patients (age: 57 +/- 22 years; 76% male) had LVEDP > 18 mmHg, and were classified accordingly as having PSE (Group 2). At logistic univariate analysis, DTa (0.005), LV EF (0.01), A'-A (< 0.0001) and % E/A (0.03) were the more powerful predictors of PSE. A'-A had the highest global accuracy in identifying PSE in patients with reduced (90%) and normal (88%) LV EF. CONCLUSION: A'-A has the highest accuracy in identifying PSE in an unselected population. This parameters should be implemented in routine echocardiography since it allows additional information about LV diastolic function assessment. |
| |
Keywords: | Doppler echocardiography left ventricular diastolic function pulmonary vein |
|
|