首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同树脂核材料影响纤维桩核整体抗折强度的比较
引用本文:高士军,李懿,孙世杰,谭静,李楠. 不同树脂核材料影响纤维桩核整体抗折强度的比较[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(21): 3304-3309. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.21.005
作者姓名:高士军  李懿  孙世杰  谭静  李楠
作者单位:佳木斯大学口腔医院修复科,黑龙江省佳木斯市 154007;伊春市卫生学校口腔教研室,黑龙江省佳木斯市 153021;佳木斯大学,黑龙江省佳木斯市 154007
摘    要:
背景:纤维桩修复中树脂核材料的选择可能影响桩核的整体强度。目的:比较5种树脂核材料分别与玻璃纤维桩结合后的整体抗折强度。方法:将50个viva玻璃纤维桩随机分为5组,分别与MEDENTAL双重固化树脂水门汀、伊蒂娜双重固化树脂水门汀、Bisco BisCem树脂水门汀、3M光固化纳米复合树脂P60及PULPDENT双重固化树脂水门汀黏结,将5组桩核的根管部分分别用自凝塑料包埋,固化后固定于万能试验机上并与牙体长轴成135°角加载于核部,加载速度为1.0 mm/min,直至断裂,测得断裂时受力情况。结果与结论:MEDENTAL双重固化树脂水门汀组、伊蒂娜双重固化树脂水门汀组、Bisco BisCem树脂水门汀组、3M光固化纳米复合树脂P60组及PULPDENT双重固化树脂水门汀组的抗折强度分别为(83.248±7.857),(89.230±4.326),(95.188±5.147),(76.646±6.463),(83.064±3.964) N。除MEDENTAL双重固化树脂水门汀组与PULPDENT双重固化树脂水门汀组抗折强度无差异外,其余各组间两两比较差异均有显著性意义(P < 0.05)。结果表明Bisco BisCem树脂水门汀与纤维桩结合后具有较高的抗折强度。中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:生物材料;骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性;组织工程全文链接:

关 键 词:生物材料  口腔生物材料  纤维桩  玻璃纤维桩  树脂黏固剂  树脂黏结剂  复合树脂核  桩核粘接材料  折裂抗力  树脂核  抗折强度测试  黏结剂  

Effects of different resin core materials on the overall flexural strength of fiber posts
Gao Shi-jun,Li Yi,Sun Shi-jie,Tan Jing,Li Nan. Effects of different resin core materials on the overall flexural strength of fiber posts[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2014, 18(21): 3304-3309. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.21.005
Authors:Gao Shi-jun  Li Yi  Sun Shi-jie  Tan Jing  Li Nan
Affiliation:Department of Prosthodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, Heilongjiang Province, China; Department of Stomatology, Yichun Municipal Health School, Jiamusi 153021, Heilongjiang Province, China; Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, Heilongjiang Province, China
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Selection of resin core materials may affect the overall strength of the fiber posts.OBJECTIVE:To compare the overall flexural strength of five kinds of resin core materials combined with glass fiber posts. METHODS:Fifty viva glass fiber posts were randomly divided into five groups respectively binding to five different resin materials for repair: group A, MEDENTAL dual curing resin cement + glass fiber post; Group B, Tina dual curing resin cement + glass fiber post; group C, Bisco BisCem + glass fiber post; group D, 3M nano composite resin curing light P60 + glass fiber post; group E, PULPDENT dual curing resin cement + glass fiber post. The root canals were embedded with self-curing plastic, and fixed in the universal testing machine. The load in tooth length axis was added onto the core at a 135° angle with a loading speed of 1.0 mm/min, until the fracture. Then, the stress at fracture and the fracture mode were measured.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The flexural strength was (83.248±7.857) N in group, (89.230±4.326) N in group B, (95.188±5.147) N in group C, (76.646±6.463) N in group D, and (83.064±3.964) N in group E. Except groups A and E, there were significant differences between every two groups (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that Bisco BisCem resin cement binding to the fiber post can obtain a higher flexural strength.
Keywords:biocompatible materials  resin cements  composite resins  glass  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国组织工程研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国组织工程研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号