首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Prognostic value of MYC rearrangement in cases of B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma
Authors:Lin Pei  Dickason Timothy J  Fayad Luis E  Lennon Patrick A  Hu Peter  Garcia Mar  Routbort Mark J  Miranda Roberto  Wang Xumei  Qiao Wei  Medeiros L Jeffrey
Institution:Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. Peilin@mdanderson.org
Abstract:

BACKGROUND:

B‐cell lymphoma, Unclassifiable with features intermediate between diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Burkitt lymphoma, for convenience referred to here as unclassifiable B‐cell lymphoma, is a category in the 2008 World Health Organization system used for a group of histologically aggressive neoplasms that are difficult to classify definitively. Currently, there is no established standard therapy for these neoplasms.

METHODS:

The authors assessed MYC status and correlated it with treatment response and outcome in a group of 52 patients with unclassifiable B‐cell lymphoma treated with either a standard DLBCL regimen (R‐CHOP rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone‐related therapy]) or more intensive regimens, such as R‐hyper‐CVAD (rituximab plus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with high‐dose methotrexate and cytarabine). The regimens were selected by the treating clinicians based on the overall clinical and pathological findings.

RESULTS:

Thirty (58%) unclassifiable B‐cell lymphomas had MYC abnormalities (MYC+) including 27 with rearrangement, 2 with amplification, and 1 with both. The MYC+ and MYC? groups were similar in their age distribution and International Prognostic Index scores. Progression‐free survival of patients with MYC+ unclassifiable B‐cell lymphoma treated initially with R‐CHOP was significantly worse than patients treated with R‐hyper‐CVAD (P = .0358). In contrast, for the MYC? unclassifiable B‐cell lymphoma group, some patients responded to R‐CHOP, and others were refractory to R‐hyper‐CVAD.

CONCLUSIONS:

MYC aberrations are common in unclassifiable B‐cell lymphoma. The presence of MYC aberrations identifies a patient subset that requires more aggressive therapy than R‐CHOP. In contrast, MYC? unclassifiable B‐cell lymphoma patients responded variably to either R‐CHOP or aggressive therapy, and the latter showed no survival advantage. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.
Keywords:gray zone lymphoma  MYC  diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma  Burkitt lymphoma  high‐grade B‐cell lymphoma
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号