PGD9 Outcomes and Cost-Benefit of Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy Introduction in Medicaid-Enrolled Asthmatic Children

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and economic impact of the introduction of inhaled corticosteroid therapy for asthma in a cohort of children 12 years and younger who were North Carolina Medicaid enrollees.
METHODS: The North Carolina Medicaid claims database was used to retrieve clinical and economic variables for the purpose of this study. The case group, which was comprised of 84 children who started corticosteroid inhaler therapy between March 1994 and March 1995, was followed up for 1 year before and 1 year after the start of the therapy. The control group was comprised of 72 children with similar severity of asthma who remained on any other therapy other than corticosteroids for a continuous 2-year period. Paired t-tests were used to compare differences, and multiple regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders.
RESULTS: There was a 58% reduction in hospital visits, and a 19% reduction in physician visits in the case group after initiation of inhaled corticosteroids. In the control group, an increase of 34% in the number of outpatient visits occurred in the second year. All the decreases and increases were statistically significant. Children with regular patterns of inhaled corticosteroid refills were found to be significantly lower costing for Medicaid. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, no significant change in health care costs per asthmatic child occurred as a result of the introduction of inhaled corticosteroid therapy.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the study found that introduction of inhaled corticosteroids in a cohort of asthmatic children enrolled in Medicaid was beneficial to Medicaid because it brought about dramatic decreases in health care utilization without additionally increasing costs.