首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

卢立康唑等七种咪唑类抗真菌药物对常见念珠菌的体外活性检测
引用本文:蔡晴,王乐,曾荣,胡素泉,陈伟,沈永年,吕桂霞,刘维达. 卢立康唑等七种咪唑类抗真菌药物对常见念珠菌的体外活性检测[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2012, 45(8): 538-540
作者姓名:蔡晴  王乐  曾荣  胡素泉  陈伟  沈永年  吕桂霞  刘维达
作者单位:1. 中国医学科学院皮肤病研究所2. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院皮肤病研究所3. 南京 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院皮肤病研究所
基金项目:“重大新药创制”科技重大专项
摘    要:
【摘要】 目的 评价卢立康唑等7种咪唑类药物对临床分离常见念珠菌的体外敏感性。方法 参考美国临床实验室标准化研究所(CLSI)的微量稀释法M27-A3方案,检测5种共183株临床分离念珠菌对卢立康唑、酮康唑、咪康唑、益康唑、克霉唑、舍他康唑、联苯苄唑7种咪唑类药物的体外敏感性。结果 酮康唑、咪康唑、益康唑、克霉唑、舍他康唑和联苯苄唑的体外最低抑菌浓度(MIC)范围(几何均数)分别为0.03 ~ 8(0.067)、0.03 ~ 16(0.071)、0.03 ~ 8(0.207)、0.03 ~ 8(0.061)、0.03 ~ 16(0.187)和0.03 ~ > 16(1.050) mg/L。卢立康唑对5种念珠菌均有较好的体外敏感性,MIC范围0.03 ~ 8 mg/L ,几何均数为0.087 mg/L,MIC50和MIC90分别为0.06 mg/L和0.5 mg/L。包括卢立康唑在内,各受试药物均有部分相对不敏感菌株。结论 除联苯苄唑外,其他6种咪唑类药物均对念珠菌有良好的体外抗菌活性,但存在少数相对不敏感菌株。

关 键 词:卢立康唑  
收稿时间:2011-11-02

In vitro activity of seven imidazole antifungals including luliconazole against common Candida species
CAI Qing , WANG Le , ZENG Rong , HU Su-quan , CHEN Wei , SHEN Yong-nian , L Gui-xia , LIU Wei-da. In vitro activity of seven imidazole antifungals including luliconazole against common Candida species[J]. Chinese Journal of Dermatology, 2012, 45(8): 538-540
Authors:CAI Qing    WANG Le    ZENG Rong    HU Su-quan    CHEN Wei    SHEN Yong-nian    L Gui-xia    LIU Wei-da
Affiliation:CAI Qing , WANG Le , ZENG Rong , HU Su-quan , CHEN Wei , SHEN Yong-nian , L(U) Gui-xia , LIU Wei-da
Abstract:
【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the in vitro activity of seven imidazole antifungals against clinical isolates of common Candida species. Methods According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) microdilution method M27-A3, the in vitro activity of luliconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, econazole, clotrimazole, sertaconazole and bifonazole was determined among 183 clinical isolates belonging to 5 species of Candida. Results The minimal inhibitory concentration range was 0.03-8(geometric mean: 0.067) mg/L for ketoconazole, 0.03-16 (geometric mean: 0.071) mg/L for miconazole, 0.03-8 (geometric mean: 0.207) mg/L for econazole, 0.03-8(geometric mean: 0.061) mg/L for clotrimazole, 0.03-16(geometric mean: 0.187) mg/L for sertaconazole and 0.03 ->16(geometric mean: 1.050) mg/L for bifonazole. Luliconazole exhibited a superior activity against the 5 species of Candida in vitro, with the MIC range being 0.03-8 mg/L, geometric mean MIC 0.087 mg/L, MIC50 0.06 mg/L and MIC90 0.5 mg/L, respectively. However, some Candida isolates were identified to be relatively insensitive to these tested antifungals, including luliconazole. Conclusion All the tested imidazole antifungals, except for bifonazole, show an excellent activity against Candida species in vitro, but there exist a few Candida strains with relative insensitivity.
Keywords:Candida  Microbial sensitivity tests  Antifungal agents
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华皮肤科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华皮肤科杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号