Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus in patients with essential tremor: stimulation below intercommissural line is more efficient but equally effective as stimulation above |
| |
Authors: | Barbe Michael T Liebhart Lena Runge Matthias Deyng Janina Florin Esther Wojtecki Lars Schnitzler Alfons Allert Niels Sturm Volker Fink Gereon R Maarouf Mohammad Timmermann Lars |
| |
Affiliation: | aDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany;bCognitive Neurology Section, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany;cDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany;dInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany;eDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany;fNeurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshoehe, Waldstrasse 2–10, 53177, Bonn, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundThe posterior subthalamic area (PSA), ventral to the intercommissural line (ICL) and the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM), has been suggested as a promising target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients suffering from essential tremor (ET). In this study the clinical benefit of VIM and PSA DBS on postural tremor suppression was systematically evaluated in a two step approach with a 3D ultrasound kinematic analysis tool.MethodsWe defined the exact position of 40 VIM-DBS-electrodes from 21 ET patients. In a first experiment with a subgroup of electrodes we subsequently activated a thalamic and a contact below ICL (sub-ICL) with equal parameter settings for within subject comparison. In a second step, we divided all electrodes into two groups, i.e. one group with activated thalamic and the other group with activated contacts below ICL and performed a group comparison under patients' individual stimulation parameters. Here, the corrected amplitude required for tremor suppression was analyzed separately for both groups.ResultsWithin subject comparison with equal parameter settings revealed a significant improvement of sub-ICL compared to thalamic stimulation. In contrast, group comparison under patients' individual stimulation did not show any significant difference in tremor suppression between VIM and PSA DBS. Although higher corrected stimulation amplitude was needed in the thalamic group this difference was not significant.ConclusionThe data suggest that sub-ICL stimulation may be more efficient compared to thalamic stimulation but equally effective when patients' individual stimulation parameters are used. |
| |
Keywords: | Essential tremor (ET) Deep brain stimulation (DBS) Thalamus Nucleus ventralis Intermedius (VIM) Posterior subthalamic area (PSA) Radiatio prelemniscalis (Raprl) Zona incerta(ZI) |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|