哮喘中医治疗临床文献的疗效分析

目的：了解中医治疗哮喘的疗效及疗效评价方法运用现状，为构建中医治疗哮喘的疗效评价体系提供借鉴。方法：检索2003-2007年国内中文期刊发表的中医治疗哮喘临床文献，将疗效评价相关的信息录入数据库，并对资料进行汇总分析。结果：共检索到中医治疗哮喘文献222篇，文献采用的诊断标准、疗效评价标准、疗效评价指标较为混乱，不同文献的观察疗程相差悬殊；疗效评价结果提示，中医治疗哮喘的总体疗效、对单个症状的改善以及对肺功能和免疫学多项指标的改善上均优于对照组。结论：现有文献报道的中医治疗哮喘的疗效表现形式复杂多样，疗效评价方法混乱，应根据中医的疗效特点构建疗效评价体系，以使中医治疗哮喘的疗效得到医药界同行的认同。

Analysis on the Curative Effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine to Asthma in Clinical Literature

Objective：To review the curative effect of traditional Chinese medicine（TCM） to asthma and the Evaluation Methods, in order to offering reference for the construction of evaluation system about asthma treated by TCM. Method： Search the clinical literature of asthma treated by TCM Which published in the domestic Chinese journals from 2003 to 2007 ,input the information of curative effect into database, and study the data. Result： 222 literature of asthma treated by TCM are retrieved. Diagnostic criteria, curative effect evaluation criteria, and indicators of curative effect of literature are chaos. Course of treatment is disparity between the difference literature; Evaluation results suggest that the TCM treatment of asthma are better than the control group on the overall effect, the improvement of individual symptoms and lung function and imrnunologieal improvement on a number of indicators. Conclusion： Manifestations of curative effect are complex and varied,evaluation methods of curative effect are confusion, the existing literature reported about asthma treated by TCM. The Evaluation system of curative effect should be constructed based on the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine, so that the curative effect of Chinese medicine treatment of asthma will be recognized by The medical sector counterparts.