Evaluation of three rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B in stool specimens |
| |
Authors: | H. Rüssmann K. Panthel R.-C. Bader C. Schmitt R. Schaumann |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Max von Pettenkofer Institute for Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Pettenkoferstrasse 9a, 80336 Munich, Germany;(2) Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 2, Building E1, 97080 Würzburg, Germany;(3) Institute for Medical Microbiology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, National Reference Laboratory for Anaerobes, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 24, 04103 Leipzig, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease continues to be difficult for clinical microbiology laboratories. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three enzyme immunoassays for detection of C. difficile toxins A and B: the recently marketed rapid enzyme immunoassay Ridascreen Clostridium difficile Toxin A/B (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) and two established enzyme immunoassays, the C. difficile Tox A/B II Assay (TechLab, Blacksburg, VA, USA) and the ProSpecT C. difficile Toxin A/B Microplate Assay (Remel, Lenexa, KS, USA). Stool specimens (n = 383) from patients with a clinical diagnosis of antibiotic-associated diarrhea were examined by these three enzyme immunoassays and were additionally cultured for C. difficile on selective agar. Samples giving discordant enzyme immunoassay results underwent confirmatory testing by tissue culture cytotoxin B assay and by PCR for toxin A (tcdA) and toxin B (tcdB) genes from C. difficile. Using the criteria adopted for this study, 60 (15.7%) samples tested positive for toxins A and/or B. Sensitivity and specificity of the enzyme immunoassays were, respectively, 88.3 and 100% for the TechLab enzyme immunoassay, 91.7 and 100% for the R-Biopharm enzyme immunoassay, and 93.3 and 100% for the Remel enzyme immunoassay. The differences between these results are statistically not significant (p > 0.05). The results show that all three enzyme immunoassays are acceptable tests for the detection of C. difficile toxins A and B directly in fecal specimens or in toxigenic cultures. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|