中医传统健身法八段锦治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床护理观察

目的:探讨中医传统健身法八段锦治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床护理措施。方法:选取本院2011年1月—2013年12月收治的70例腰椎间盘突出症患者为研究对象,抽签将其分为两组,各35例,对照组患者行八段锦健身法常规护理,观察组患者在对照组基础上行舒适护理,对两组患者恢复效果及护理满意度进行比较。结果:观察组总有效率为91.43%,总满意率为94.29%;对照组总有效率及总满意率分别为68.53%和71.43%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗均对患者的各种症状与体征状况有所改善。实验组27例下腰痛患者治疗后积分为2.35±0.39,明显高于对照组的1.91±0.35;实验组31例腿痛麻痹患者治疗后积分为2.43±0.37,明显高于对照组的1.61±0.17;实验组35例患者治疗后步行能力积分为2.51±0.23,明显高于对照组的1.51±0.25;实验组35例患者治疗后直腿抬高能力积分为2.62±0.17,明显高于对照组的1.21±0.25;实验组35例患者治疗后肌力积分为2.29±0.45,明显高于对照组的1.11±0.16;实验组35例患者治疗日常生活能力积分为11.27±1.34,明显高于对照组的8.37±1.47;相比对照组的疗效,实验组更显著,两种数据对比均有明显差异,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:加强腰椎间突出症患者八段锦健身锻炼及舒适护理干预,能有效改善患者腰痛等症状,提高患者生活质量。

Clinical Nursing Observation on Traditional Approach of TCM Baduanjin in Treatment of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Protrusion

Objective ： To explore the traditional approach of TCM Baduanjin clinical nursing in the treatment of lumbar inter-vertebral disc protrusion. Methods ： In our hospital between January 2011 and December 20l 1,70 cases of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion were as the research object and divided into two groups. 35 cases in the control group patients used Baduanjin and routine nursing care and experiment group added comfortable nursing. The recovery effect of two groups and nursing satisfaction were compared. Results ：The experiment group＇s total effective rate was 91.43% and the overall satisfaction rate was 94. 29%. Control group＇s total effective rate and total satisfaction rate were 68. 53% and 71.43% respectively. The two groups were statisti- cally significant, P 〈 0.05. Two groups both improved variety of symptoms and signs. Experimental group＇s 27 patients with low back pain integral was 2. 35 ±0. 39 after treatment, significantly higher than that of the control group （1.91 ± 0. 35 ）. Experimen- tal group＇s 31 patients with leg pain paralysis integral was 2.43 ± 0. 37 after treatment,significantly higher than that of the con- trol group（ 1.61 ± 0. 17）. Walking ability score after in experiment group＇s 35 patients was 2. 51 ± 0. 23, significantly higher than that of the control group（ 1.51 ± 0. 25）. Experimental group＇s 35 patients straight leg - raising ability score was 2. 62 ± 0. 17 after treatment,significantly higher than that of the control group （ 1.21 ± 0. 25）. Experimental group＇s 35 cases muscle strength score was 2.29 ± 0.45 after treatment,significantly higher than that of the control group （ 1, 11± O. 16）. Treatment group＇s 35 patients daily life ability score was 11.27 ± 1.34,significantly higher than that of the control＂group （8. 37 ± 1.47）. The curative effect of the experimental group was more obvious. The data comparison had the obvious difference and was statisti- cally significant （P 〈 0. 05 ）. Conclusion：Patients wi