|
|||||
|
|
| 净化机与紫外线空气消毒效果对比研究 | |
| 引用本文： | 程少霞,聂琼瑛,刘标英,李素春. 净化机与紫外线空气消毒效果对比研究[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2003, 11(5): 298-299 |
| 作者姓名： | 程少霞 聂琼瑛 刘标英 李素春 |
| 作者单位： | 广东省计划生育专科医院,广州,510600 |
| 摘 要： | 目的:比较净化机与紫外线空气消毒效果的优劣。方法:分别于净化机和紫外线杀菌灯消毒后,采用平板暴露法对洁净手术室手术前30min、手术开始后30min、60min、90min采样进行空气细菌培养。结果:手术前30min和手术开始后30min,两种空气消毒法的消毒效果无显著性差异,且符合卫生部颁布的Ⅱ类手术室空气含菌量的标准;而手术开始后60min、90min两种空气消毒法的消毒效果有显著性差异。结论:净化消毒法优于紫外线杀菌灯消毒法。 |
| 关 键 词： | 净化机 紫外线 空气消毒 细菌培养 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-02-24 |
The Contrast Study on the Purifying Machine and the Ultraviolet Ray Air to Disinfect effect |
|
| Cheng Shaoxia,Nie Qiongying,Liu Biaoying,et al.. The Contrast Study on the Purifying Machine and the Ultraviolet Ray Air to Disinfect effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 2003, 11(5): 298-299 | |
| Authors: | Cheng Shaoxia Nie Qiongying Liu Biaoying et al. |
| Affiliation: | Cheng Shaoxia,Nie Qiongying,Liu Biaoying,et al. Family Planning Special Hospital,Guangdong,510600. |
| Abstract: | Objective: Comparing to the purify machine with the ultraviolet ray air in the way of disinfect. Method: After being disinfected by the purifying machine and the ultraviolet ray bactericdal lamp respectiuely, the dean operator room was to sample and carry out air bacteria culture in 30 minutes before operation and 30 minutes,60 minutes and 90 minutes after operation by method of the flat board exposed. Result: There is no significent result of these two methods in 30 minutes hefore operation and 30 minutes after operation, and it fits the hygiene part issues Ⅱ , the standard of air bacteria capacity. The result of two methods has significance difference in 60 minutes,90 minutes after operation. Conclusion:Purifying the machine to disinfect is superior to that the ultraviolet ray bactericidal lamp disinfects. |
| Keywords: | Purification machine Ultraviolet ray air Bacteria culture |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |